Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy

ISSN 1819-7671 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1948 (Online)


Full text:
(downloads: 35)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
37.014
EDN: 
SAMYNV

Medicalization of the educational process: Stating the problem

Autors: 
Gumarova Anastasia Nikolaevna, Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov
Abstract: 

Introduction. The spread of medical theories and practices to various spheres of society is becoming a significant factor in the development of society. In the scientific literature this phenomenon is called medicalization. The essence, causes and consequences of medicalization are comprehended in philosophical and bioethical discourses. Medicalized practices are also being introduced into the process of education. Theoretical analysis. Consideration of the problem made it possible to reveal that pedagogical means of solving the problems of education are supplemented or replaced by means of medical influence on the human body. The features of students’ behavior are marked as symptoms of neuropsychiatric diseases that require treatment. Correction of students’ behavior with the help of medical means is associated with the disciplinary nature of education, considered in the biopolitical concept of M. Foucault. The transformation of the cultural understanding of the norm under the influence of natural science theory stands out as a trend of the development of modern science, contributing to the growth of medicalization. Also, the development of the biological concept of psychiatry and the achievements of neuroscience contribute to the medicalization of the process of education. Conclusion. The medicalization of the process of education is followed by new social risks that have philosophical, methodological, social, humanitarian and ethical grounds. It is concluded that it is necessary to conduct a social and humanitarian examination of medicalized educational practices and analyze the compliance of medicalized practices with the goals and objectives of education.

Reference: 
  1. Svetlichnaya T. G., Smirnova E. A. Theoretical and conceptual approaches and results of the empirical study of medicalization phenomenon (literature review). Logos et Praxis [Logos et Praxis], 2017, no. 3, pp. 145–160 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.15688/lp.jvolsu.2017.3.17
  2. Rasskazov L. D. Russian crises and the medicalization of society: The philosophical analysis of current social phenomena. Vestnik BGU [The Bryansk State University Herald], 2016, no. 3, pp. 57–67 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18101/1994-0866-2016-3-57-67
  3. Bryzgalina E. V., Gumarova A. N. Neuroethics: Discussions about the subject. Epistemologiya & fi losofi ya nauki [Epistemology & Philosophy of Science], 2022, no. 1, pp. 136–153 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202259111
  4. DeGrandpre R. Ritalin nation: Rapid-fi re culture and the transformation of human consciousness. New York, W. W. Norton, 1999. 286 p.
  5. Nootropics, caffeine, marijuana: students say what they take during the session. Afi shaDaily, 2017. Available at: https://daily.afisha.ru/cities/5807-nootropy-kofeinmarihuana-studenty-govoryat-chto-oni-prinimayutvo-vremya-sessii/ (accessed 9 February 2023) (in Russian).
  6. Methods of child psychotherapy. SM-Clinic. Multidisciplinary medical center. Available at: https://detskiy-medcentr-spb.ru/doctor/detskij-psikhoterapevt/zabolevaniya-psikhoterapevt/1872-metody-psikhoterapii  (accessed 9 February 2023) (in Russian).
  7. Uyridicheskaya sotsial’naya set’ (Legal social network). Available at: https://www.9111.ru/questions/18624476/ (accessed 9 February 2023) (in Russian).
  8. Yudin B. G. Chelovek: vykhod za predely [Human: Going Beyond]. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2018. 470 p. (in Russian).
  9. Popova O. V. Telo kak territoriya tekhnologiy: ot sotsial’noy inzhenerii k etike biotekhnologicheskogo konstruirovaniya [The Body as a Territory of Technology: From Social Engineering to the Ethics of Biotechnological Design]. Moscow, Kanon+ ROOI “Reabilitatsiya” Publ., 2021. 336 p. (in Russian).
  10. Sidorova T. A. Ethical and philosophical aspects of the transfer of neurothechnology via biomedical enhancer. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University], 2019, no. 5 (427), pp. 46–54 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.24411/1994-2796-2019-10508
  11. Mikhel D. V. Illness as a Social Diagnosis: Philosophy of Social Exclusion and Reintegration. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2017, vol. 17, iss. 2, pp. 156–161 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2017-17-2-156-161
  12. Foucault M. Surveiller et punir. Paris, Gallimard, 1975. 352 p. (Russ. ed.: Fuko M. Nadzirat’ i nakazyvat’. Moscow, Ad Marginem Publ., 1999. 479 p.).
  13. Giroux H. A. Zombie Politics and Culture in the Age of Casino Capitalism. New York, Media and Communication, 2015. 205 p. (Russ. ed.: Zhiru A. A. Zombi-politika i kul’tura v epokhu kazino-kapitalizma. Khar’kov, Gumanitarnyy Tsentr Publ., 2015. 280 p.).
  14. Hasler F. Neuromythologie: Eine Streitschrift gegen die Deutungsmacht der Hirnforschung. Bielefeld, Transcript, 2012. 264 p. (Russ. ed.: Khasler F. Neyromifologiya. Chto my deystvitel’no znaem o mozge i chego my ne znaem o nem. Moscow, AST Publ., 2022. 390 p.).
  15. Vidal F., Ortega F. Being Brains: Making the Cerebral Subject. New York, Fordham University Press, 2017. 304 p. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780823276097
  16.  
Received: 
19.02.2023
Accepted: 
27.03.2023
Published: 
30.06.2023