Semantic frame as an element of meaning-making
Introduction. In the modern socio-cultural space, the concept of the meaning of the text of culture, the process of meaning-making have become relevant among scientists. Previously, these concepts were considered in linguistics, psychology and philosophy, today they have become popular among cultural scientists, and art historians. A theoretical analysis of the concept of “frame” allows us to conclude that a frame is a fragment of a person’s memory, representing knowledge about a particular cultural phenomenon. Consideration of the frame in the structure of meaning-making allowed us to reveal that the frame is a cognitive component of the meaning-forming structure. The semantic frame is associated with the concept of understanding the text of culture, which we designate as an artifact, a semantic model of consciousness. In the presence of semantic experience, it is possible to understand the text of culture. We associate the frame with the practical activity of a person and society, that is, with the meaning given to him in the experience of cultural activity. Conclusion. A semantic frame is an element of meaning-making, since it carries knowledge about a particular cultural phenomenon and allows us to establish the meaning of a given cultural text, its axiological meaning. A frame is a generalized frame of experience, a scheme of practical action in which images are revealed through functions. The truth of the frame is established in practice, since a person is a practical and expedient being.
- Minskij M. Frejmy dlja predstavlenija znanij [Frames for Knowledge Representation]. Moscow, Energiya Publ., 1979. 151 p.
- Gofman I. Analiz frejmov: esse ob organizatsii povsed nevnogo opyta [Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Everyday Experience]. Moscow, Institut sotsiologii RAN Publ., 2004. 752 p.
- Fillmor Ch. Frames and Semantics of Understanding. Novoe v zarubezhnoj lingvistike. Vyp. 23: Kognitivnye aspekty jazyka [New in foreign linguistics. Iss. 23: Cognitive aspects of language]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1988, pp. 52–92 (in Russian).
- Fauconnier G., Turner M. Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science. 1998, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 133–187.