Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy

ISSN 1819-7671 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1948 (Online)

Full text:
(downloads: 33)
Article type: 

“The old burden” of subjectivity in criticism of L. Feuerbach and Junghegelianer

Misyurov Nikolay Nikolaevich, Omsk State University

The article is devoted to the consideration of key aspects of the socio-political meaning and direction of the philosophical and theological doctrine of the Junghegelianer. The nomination of philosophy as the “mother of sciences”, combining the old metaphysics and new dialectic, to the center of the social “agenda” is explained both by internal reasons (split in the Hegel “school”, competition from positivism, renaissance of theological thought), and the impact of external factors. The problem of understanding “subjectivity” in the philosophical critique of the 1840s, which turned out to be a stumbling block for many panellists, is explored; the categorical content of the concept has not been clarified. The task is to identify the basic characteristics of such widely interpreted “subjectivity” and clarify the positions of the parties. Replacing the speculative practices of the “old” Kantian school with intellectual (going from Schelling) “procedures” of philosophizing formed a completely new philosophical paradigm of a different era. The revolution of 1848 updated many philosophical ideas, filling them with social content. The conclusions state the contradiction and a certain eclecticism of the philosophical designs of the Junghegelianer.

  1. Grigorjan B. (ed.) Burzhuaznaya fi losofskaya antropologiya XX veka [Bourgeois Philosophical Anthropology of the 20th Century]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1986. 296 p. (in Russian).
  2. Van Dijk T. A. Yazyk. Poznanie. Kommunikatsiya [Language. Cognition. Communication]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1989. 312 p. (in Russian).
  3. Feuerbach L. Sochineniya [Writings]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1995, vol. 1. 502 p. (in Russian).
  4. Cassier E. Izbrannoe. Opyt o cheloveke [Selected Works. An Essay on Man]. Moscow, Gardarika Publ., 1998. 784 p. (in Russian).
  5. Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniia [Writings]. Moscow, Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo politicheskoy literatury, 1955, vol. 2. 652 p. (in Russian).
  6. Dilthey W. Sushchnost’ fi losofi i [The Essence of Philosophy]. Moscow, Intrada Publ., 2001. 160 p. (in Russian).
  7. Lifshitz M. (ed.) Estetika Gegelya i sovremennost [Hegel’s Aesthetics and Modernity]. Moscow, Izobrazitel’noe iskusstvo Publ., 1984. 272 p. (in Russian).
  8. Bauer B. Trubnyi glas strashnogo suda nad Gegelem [Trumpet of the Last Judgment against Hegel]. Moscow, Krasand Publ., 2010. 144 p. (in Russian).
  9. Hegel G. W. F. Filosofi ia religii: v 2 t. [Philosophy of Religion: in 2 vols.]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1975, vol. 1. 532 p. (in Russian).
  10. Strauss D. F. Zhizn’ Iisusa [The Life of Jesus]. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 1992. 528 p. (in Russian).
  11. Lambrecht L., Tietz K.-E. Arnold Ruge (1802-1880): Beitra ge zum 200. Geburtstag. Frankfurt am Main, New York, Peter Lang Publ., 2002. 148 p.
  12. Breckman W. Marx, the young Hegelians, and the origins of radical social theory dethroning the self. London, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1998. 348 p.
  13. Peskov A. M. Germanskii kompleks slavianofi lov [German complex of Slavophiles]. In: Rossiya i Germaniya: opyt fi losofskogo dialoga [Russia and Germany: The experience of Philosophical Dialogue]. Moscow, Medium Publ., 1993, pp. 53-94 (in Russian).
  14. Ameriks K. The legacy of idealism in the philosophy of Feuerbach, Marx, and Kierkegaard. In: The Cambridge Companion to German Idealism. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 258-281.
  15. Bruggen F. Hegelianismus und Hegelkritik. Theoriegewinne und Theoriedefi zite im Vormarz. In: Internationale Feuerbachforschung, 2018, Bd. 7, S. 139-153.