Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy

ISSN 1819-7671 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1948 (Online)

Full text:
(downloads: 35)
Article type: 

Genesis of the problem formation of digital intercultural competence in the period from the 1970s until the early 2000s

Savelyeva Nelly Khismatullayeva, Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin

The analysis of works on the problems of vocational education pedagogy made it possible to highlight the crisis points in its development, associated, first of all, with the inconsistency of the educational results content with the requirements of employers and the priorities of state policy in the field of digitalization and innovation. The system of forming employees' key competencies has become one of the priority conditions for the creation and effective functioning of the Russian state innovative economy. The active and widespread introduction of modern science-intensive technologies leads to an increase in the requirements of the state and society for the qualifications of university graduates, the level of their intercultural competence, and readiness to master new approaches to professional activity. These factors explain the close attention of scientists and specialists from different branches of knowledge and areas of pedagogy, psychology, public administration, sociology, informatics, etc., to the problems of intercultural training of future specialists in the context of globalization. The article proposes the periodization of the development of the problem of forming digital intercultural competence, the identification of characteristic trends at the second stage of the problem development, the identification of socio-cultural, historical, scientific and theoretical prerequisites for its formation and development. At the same time, the etymological complexity and diversity of the research problem led to the identification of historical trends in several directions: emergence of information society; formation of the competence nature of the higher education system; development of the problem of forming intercultural competence.

  1. Kontseptsiya formirovaniya i razvitiya edinogo informatsionnogo prostranstva Rossii i sootvetstvuyuscshikh gosudarstvennykh informatsionnykh resursov (The Concept of Formation and Development of a Unifi ed Information Space of Russia and the Corresponding State Information Resources). Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=EXP&n=240699#3FIGRxSiyZ7HUo4n  (accessed 18 February 2021) (in Russian).
  2. O kontseptsii innovatsionnoy politiki Rossiiskoy Federatsii na 1998–2000 gg.: postanovleniye Pravitelstva RF от 24 iyulya 1998 г. № 832 (About the conseption of innovative politics of the Russian Federation for 1998–2000: Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation of July 24, 1998 No. 832). Available at: http://ivo.garant.ru/#document/179112/paragraph/4:0  (accessed 18 February 2021) (in Russian).
  3. Auernheimer G. Einfuhrung in die Interkulturelle Padagogik [Introduction to Intercultural Pedagogy]. Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1995. 268 S. (in German).
  4. Gohlich M. et al. Transkulturalitat und Padagogik [Transculturality and Pedagogy]. Integration to Scientifi c Culturological Concept and Its Pedagogical Relevancy]. Weinheim, Munchen, Juventa, 2006, 196 p. (in German).
  5. Gohlich M., Liebau E., Leonhard Hans-Walter, Zirfas J. Transkulturalitat und Padagogik. In: Gohlich M., ed. Transkulturalitat und Padagogik. Interdisziplinare Annaherungen an ein kulturwissenschaftliches Konzept und seine padagogische Relevanz [Transculturality and Pedagogy. Interdisciplinary Links with Cultural Concepts and its Pedagogical Relevance]. Weinheim, Munchen, Juventa, 2006, pp. 7–29 (in German).
  6. Datta A. Hrsg. Transkulturalitat und Identitat. Bildungsprozesse zwischen Exklusion und Inklusion [Transculturality and Identity. Educational Processes Between Exclusion and Inclusion]. Frankfurt am Main, Verlag fur Interkulturelle Kommunikation, 2005. 226 p. (in German).
  7. Gippert W., Gotte P., Kleinau E. Transkulturalitat. Gender- und bildungstheoretische Perspektiven [Transculturality. Gender and Educational-Theoretical Perspectives]. Bielefeld, Transcript, 2008. 301 p. (in German).
  8. Schofthaler T. Multikulturelle und transkulturelle Erziehung – zwei Wege zu kosmopolitischen kulturellen Identitaten [Multicultural and Transcultural Education – Two Paths to Cosmopolitan Cultural Identities]. International Review of Education, 1984, no. 3, pp. 11–24 (in German).
  9. Hymes D. On Communicative Competence. In: J. B. Pride, J. Holmes, eds. Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1972, pp. 269–293.
  10. Leontovich О. А. Rossiya i SSHA: Vvedeniye v mezhkulturnuyu kommunikatsiyu [Russia and the United States: An Introduction to Intercultural Communication]. Volgograd, Peremena Publ., 2003. 399 p. (in Russian).
  11. Galskova N. D., Gez N. I. Teoriya obucheniya inostrannym yazykam. Lingvodidaktika i metodika. 8-e izd., ispr. i dop. [Theory of Teaching Foreign Languages. Language Education and Methods. 8th ed., rev. and add.]. Мoscow, Akademiya Publ., 2015. 363 p. (in Russian).
  12. Raven Dzh. Kompetentnost v sovremennom obscshestve. Viyavleniye, razvitiye i realizatsiya [Competence in Modern Society. Identifi cation, Development and Implementation]. Trans. from English. Мoscow, KogitoTsentr Publ., 2002. 396 p. (in Russian).