Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy

ISSN 1819-7671 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1948 (Online)


Full text:
(downloads: 32)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
37.013.41

Skepticism: Historical and logical forms and perspectives

Autors: 
Maslov Vadim Mikhailovich, Nizhny Novgorod State University. NI Lobachevsky
Abstract: 

Introduction. The permanent relevance of skepticism is due to its ancestral connection with philosophy. The problematic nature of the definition of «skepticism» in the conditions of post-non-classical ambiguity of modern social development determines the immediate relevance of the analysis of skepticism. The complexity and novelty of the goal determine the choice of the historical and logical method of research and the emphasis on its logical component. Theoretical analysis. A consistent analysis identifies three main historical and logical forms of philosophical skepticism: absolute, partial and methodological. Absolute skepticism is a consequence of uncompromising acceptance of agnosticism (Pyrrhon). Absolute skepticism, relativism and dogmatism exhaust the question of the possibility of philosophy. Absolute skepticism, which is self-destructing, cannot serve as the basis for life. Acceptance of agnosticism and finding reliable knowledge in the world around a person are the essence of «partial skepticism» (Sextus Empiricus). The reliable knowledge necessary for him or her is open to dogmatism (I. Kant). The quality of critical developments of skepticism, on the one hand, can strengthen the position of relativism and contribute to the growth of doubt in the world, on the other hand, leads to the formation of «methodological skepticism» – auxiliary tools for criticizing someone else and asserting one’s point of view (scientific skepticism). Conclusion. In the modern world, the importance of positively balanced and maximally justified partial skepticism is growing, the specifics of which is consonant with the emerging post-non-classical rationality.

Reference: 
  1. Lomako O. M. The world risk society in Ulrich Beck’s political philosophy: Logic and irony. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2018, vol. 18, iss. 3, pp. 265–269 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2018-18-3-265-269
  2. Pivovarov D. V. Skepticism, nihilism and cynicism. Vestnik Ural’skogo instituta jekonomiki, upravlenija i prava [Bulletin of the Ural Institute of Economics, Management and Law], 2010, no. 1 (10), pp. 88–95 (in Russian).
  3. Jarcev R. A. On the ranking of scientifi c knowledge based on rational skepticism. Filosofi ja nauki [Philosophy of Science], 2013, no. 2, pp. 48–60 (in Russian).
  4. Losev A. F. Istorija antichnoj jestetiki. Rannij jellinizm [The history of ancient aesthetics. Early Hellenism]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2000. 960 p. (in Russian).
  5. Comesana J., Klein P. Skepticism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: https://plato.stanford. edu/entries/skepticism/ (accessed 18 April 2022).
  6. Sanzhenakov A. A. Deleuze: The history of philosophy as creativity. Sibirskij filosofskij zhurnal [Siberian Philosophical Journal], 2018, no. 3, pp. 250–257 (in Russian). https://doi.org/25205/2541-7517-2018-16- 3-250-257
  7. Fragmenty rannih grecheskih fi losofov. Chast’ 1. Ot jepicheskih teokosmogonij do vozniknovenie atomistiki [The Fragments from the Early Greek Philosophers. Part 1. From Epic Theocosmogonies to the Birth of Atomistics]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1989. 576 p. (in Russian).
  8. Sekst Jempirik. Sochinenija: v 2 t. T. 2 [Essays: in 2 vols. Vol. 2]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1976. 421 p. (in Russian).
  9. Lajertskij Diogen. A. F. Losev, ed. by. O zhizni, uchenijah i izrechenijah znamenityh fi losofov [On the Life, Teachings and Sayings of Famous Philosophers]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1979. 620 p. (in Russian).
  10. Nicshe F. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij: v 13 t. T. 1, ch. 2. Nesvoevremennye razmyshlenija. Iz nasledija 1872–1873 gg. [Complete Works: in 13 vols. Vol. 1, part 2. Untimely refl ections. From the heritage of 1872–1873]. Moscow, Kul’turnaja revoljucija Publ., 2013. 480 p. (in Russian).
  11. Popper K. V. N. Sadovskii, ed. by. Logika i rost nauchnogo znanija [Logic and the Growth of Scientific Knowledge]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1983. 605 p. (in Russian).
  12. Boguslavskij V. M. Skepticizm v fi losofi i [Skepticism in Philosophy]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1980. 270 p. (in Russian).
  13. Kurtc P. Novyj skepticizm: Issledovanie i nadezhnoe znanie [New Skepticism: Research and Reliable Knowledge]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2005. 360 p. (in Russian).
  14. Stepin V. S. Teoreticheskoe znanie [Theoretical Knowledge]. Moscow, Progress-Tradicija Publ., 2003. 774 p. (in Russian).
Received: 
21.04.2022
Accepted: 
22.06.2022
Published: 
30.09.2022