The problem of liberty: The importance of theorizing about classical liberal philosophy in the compatibilism concept formation
Introduction. Modern discussions about free will are reduced to the confrontation between compatibilism and incompatibilism. The desire of the former to connect the free will of the individual with physical conditioning actualizes the problem of responsibility for the moral actions performed by the individual. Theoretical analysis. The main socio-philosophical reflections on liberty and responsibility in the context of the 17th century liberalism theory are analyzed. The concepts of T. Hobbes, J. Locke and B. Spinoza are interpreted through the prism of the rational justification of liberty, understanding the correlation between a person’s choice and his actions. The paradigm of new thinking, created by liberal philosophers, made it possible to assess the meaning of freedom in a fundamentally different way – from the point of view of the interaction between an individual and society. A comparative analysis of the provisions on free will allows us to assert the aggravation of the problem of moral responsibility, caused by the rational awareness of free action criteria. Conclusion. The ideas of classical liberal-thinking philosophers acted as a theoretical foundation in the development of the compatibilism concept, the supporters of which associated freedom with necessity. Thus, we can talk about the continuity outlined back in antiquity – from freedom as a “cognized necessity” to its understanding as free will.
- Fromm E. Escape from Freedom. New York, Farrar and Rinehart, Inc., 1941. 305 p. (Russ. ed.: Fromm E. Begstvo ot svobody. Moscow, AST, 2006. 571 p.).
- Vasilev V. V. In defense of classical compati bilism. Voprosy filosofii [Voprosy Filosofii], 2016, no. 2, pp. 64–76 (in Russian).
- Zolotareva T. N. Problems of freedom realization in the philosophy of Renaissance and Modern times. Vestnik Kalmytskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Kalmyk University], 2018, no. 2 (38), pp. 155–161.
- Hobbes T. Leviathan. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1909. 557 p. (Russ. ed.: Gobbs T. Leviafan. Moscow, Mysl’, 2001. 478 p.).
- Mae Q. T. The Hobbesian Concept of Freedom: Are we really free? Polytechnic University of the Philippines. July 2021. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352992860_The_Hobbesian
_Concept_of_Freedom_Are_we_really_free (accessed Desember 15, 2022). - Tsanava B. Z. The evolution of concept of liberty in political philosophy of Thomas Hobbes. Politicheskaya ekspertiza: POLITEKS [Political Expertise: POLITEKS], 2019, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 549–565 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu23.219.408
- Locke J. An essay concerning human understanding. Toronto, University of Toronto, 1825. 568 p. (Russ. ed.: Lokk Dzh. Sochineniya: v 3 t. T. 3. Moscow, Mysl’, 1985. 621 p.).
- Manda V. The Concept of Freedom in Locke. Filozofi a, January, 2013, no. 68 (2), pp. 105–113.
- Abramov M. A. The Problem of liberty and liberties in British Enlightenment Philosophy. In: Kruglikov V. A., ans. ed. Sotsialnaya filosofiya i filosofskaya antropologiya. Trudy i issledovaniya [Social Philosophy and Philosophical Anthropology. Proceedings and Research]. Moscow, Institute of Philosophy RAN Publ., 1995, pp. 26–43 (in Russian).
- Zorina N. V. The idea of free will and affect in the political and legal concept of Benedict Spinoza. Pravovoe gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika [Rule of Law: Theory and Practice], 2019, no. 4 (58), pp. 25–32 (in Russian).
- The Selected Works of Baruch de Spinoza, by Library of Alexandria, 2000. 777 p. (Russ. ed.: Spinoza B. Izbrannye proizvedeniya: v 2 t. T. 1. Moscow, Gospolitizdat, 1957. 727 p.).
- Tippelt H. Being oneself and being self-conscious. Spinoza’s concept of freedom. E-LOGOS, 2020, no. 27 (1), pp. 56–70. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.e-logos.472
- Spinoza B. Ethic: Demonstrated in Geometrical Order and Divided into Five Parts. Whitefi sh, Kessinger Publishing, 2010. 396 p. (Russ. ed.: Spinoza B. Etika, dokazannaya v geometricheskom poryadke i razdelennaya na pyat chastey. Moscow, Tipo-Litografiya Tovarishchestva I. N. Kushnerev i K°, 1911. 384 p.).
- Chalyy V. A. Denying liberty in order to make room for freedom: Liberalism, conservatism, and Kantian philosophy. Voprosy filosofii [Voprosy Filosofi i], 2015, no. 9, pp. 66–78.