Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy

ISSN 1819-7671 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1948 (Online)


For citation:

Grishechkina N. V., Tikhonova S. V., Ustyantsev V. B. Transdisciplinarity in the problematic fi eld of social philosophy: “An exchange zone” vs “a socio-epistemic arena”. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2024, vol. 24, iss. 2, pp. 128-132. DOI: 10.18500/1819-7671-2024-24-2-128-132 , EDN: JYWAGO

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 61)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
[1:316]:004
EDN: 
JYWAGO

Transdisciplinarity in the problematic fi eld of social philosophy: “An exchange zone” vs “a socio-epistemic arena”

Autors: 
Grishechkina Nataliya V., Saratov State University
Tikhonova Sofia Vladimirovna, Saratov State University
Ustyantsev Vladimir Borisovich, Saratov State University
Abstract: 

Introduction. Transdisciplinarity as a fundamental characteristic of hybrid informal knowledge specific to a digital society can be explicated in the problematic field of social philosophy. Theoretical analysis. The main categorical explication of transdisciplinarity is the comparison of the concepts of an exchange zone and socio-epistemic arenas. The first is defined by the categorical series of the philosophy of science, the second is a socio-philosophical construct. A comparative analysis allows us to conclude that the exchange zones initially reflect the inter-institutional status of communication, dating back to P. Galison, and initially the leading role in it belongs to a humanitarian specialist who acts as a mediator. In socio-epistemic arenas, more importance is given to media and ordinary people, who coincide in a digital society with the widest possible range of users. A compromise position can be formulated when referring to the model of trans-epistemic cultures of K. Knorr-Cetina. Conclusion. Transdisciplinarity as a special digital zone producing trans-epistemic cultures has features of both an exchange zone and a socio-epistemic arena. Its hybrid characteristics are determined by the structure of a digital society in which institutional boundaries are permeable, horizontal interaction accompanies and strengthens vertical interaction, and networks are mechanisms for the distribution of knowledge by default.

Reference: 
  1. Pirozhkova S. V. The principle of participation and contemporary mechanisms of producing knowledge in science. Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, 2018, vol. 55, iss. 1, pp. 67–82 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.5840/eps20185519
  2. Shibarshina S. V. Social networks for researchers on the internet: A new sociality? Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, 2019, vol. 56, iss. 4. pp. 21–28 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.5840/eps201956463
  3. Petrova E. V. Interdisciplinarity and crowdsourcing in ecology as reply to the challenges of technogenic civilization. Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, 2020, vol. 57, iss. 4, pp. 117–122 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202057463
  4. Erofeeva M. A. Jokes aside! Actor-network theory on the legitimization of scientific knowledge. Sotsiologiya vlasti [Sociology of Power], 2012, no. 6–7, pp. 27–37 (in Russian).
  5. Polonskaya I. N. B. Latour's alternative sociology: concerning methodology description. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya [Theory and Practice of Social Development], 2012, no. 6, pp. 72–75 (in Russian).
  6. Sosnovskaya A. M. The problem of applying the actornetwork theory method in media theory and media communication. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 2023, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 282–304 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.46539/gmd.v5i4.435
  7. Kasavin I. T. Exchange zones as the subject of social philosophy of science. Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, 2017, vol. 51, iss. 1, pp. 8–17 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.5840/eps20175111
  8. Artamonov D. S. Socio-epistemic arenas of historical cognition. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2022, vol. 22, iss. 3, pp. 238–242 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2022-22-3-238-242
  9. Galison P. Exchange zone: Coordination of beliefs and actions. Voprosy istorii estestvoznaniya i tekhniki [Studies in the History of Science and Technology], 2004, no. 1, pp. 64–91 (in Russian).
  10. Artamonov D. S. Media Memory in the Communication Space of a Digital Society. Diss. Dr. Sci. (Philos). Saratov, 2023. 356 p.
  11. Knorr-Cetina K. Scientific Communities or Transepistemic Arenas of Research? A Critique of Quasi-Economic Models of Science. Social Studies of Science, 1982, no. 12, pp. 101–130.
Received: 
28.01.2024
Accepted: 
02.05.2024
Published: 
28.06.2024