Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy

ISSN 1819-7671 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1948 (Online)


For citation:

Yakovleva V. R. The socio-cultural foundations of Soviet society in the context of secularization theory. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2026, vol. 26, iss. 2, pp. 131-134. DOI: 10.18500/1819-7671-2026-26-2-131-134, EDN: EBEYDS

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 0)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
[316.722+316.75](47+57)
EDN: 
EBEYDS

The socio-cultural foundations of Soviet society in the context of secularization theory

Autors: 
Yakovleva Valeria R., Ss Cyril and Methodius Institute for Post-Graduate Studies
Abstract: 

Introduction. This article examines the socio-cultural foundations of Soviet society through the theoretical lens of modern secularization studies. Its central aim is to challenge reductive and monistic interpretations of the Soviet heritage. Theoretical analysis. The analysis employs a contemporary, multidimensional theory of secularization, which posits a transformation, rather than a mere decline, of the religion in modern societies. From this perspective, the study identifies two functionally interconnected, yet genetically distinct, foundational pillars of the Soviet project: Marxist ideology, conceptualized as a “transcendent” force driving revolutionary action, and Russian high classical culture, which served as a repository of the “sacred”. The argument demonstrates that while the regime instrumentalized classical culture for legitimation and social engineering, the cultural sphere maintained a significant degree of autonomy. Conclusion. The research reveals the duality of the Soviet heritage, emphasizing the independence of Soviet culture from communist ideology. Such a differentiated approach allows for a more balanced attitude towards the Soviet past, moving away from ideological monism, and facilitates the productive use of the best examples of Soviet culture in contemporary socio-cultural space.

Reference: 
  1. Somin N. V., ed. Pravoslavnyy sotsialism [Orthodox socialism]. St. Petersburg, Aleteiya, 2025. 486 p. (in Russian).
  2. Shatkin M. A., Orlov M. O. Ethnocultural tradition as heritage: The modern reconceptualization. Russia and the Contemporary World, 2024, no. 4 (125), pp. 190–204 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.31249/rsm/2024.04.12, EDN: IIVBWI
  3. Burchardt M. Material secularities. Secular Studies, 2025, vol. 7, iss. 2, pp. 371–376. https://doi.org/10.1163/25892525-bja10083
  4. Joas H. Under the Spell of Freedom: Theory of Religion after Hegel and Nietzsche. New York, Oxford University Press, 2024. 485 p.
  5. Blankholm J. The Secular Paradox: On the Religiosity of the Not Religious. New York, NYU Press, 2022. 297 p.
  6. Hanson S. E. Time and Revolution: Marxism and the Design of Soviet Institutions. Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina Press, 1997. 257 p.
  7. Clark K. Moscow, the fourth Rome: Stalinism, cosmopolitanism, and the evolution of Soviet culture, 1931–1941. Cambridge, MA, London, Harvard University Press, 2011. 420 p. (Russ. ed.: Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2018. 520 p.)
Received: 
28.11.2025
Accepted: 
12.03.2026
Published: 
01.06.2026