Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy

ISSN 1819-7671 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1948 (Online)

For citation:

Gogol S. S. Generalized readiness as a socio-psychological attitude . Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2024, vol. 24, iss. 1, pp. 73-78. DOI: 10.18500/1819-7671-2024-24-1-73-78, EDN: FUDPMN

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 34)
Article type: 

Generalized readiness as a socio-psychological attitude

Gogol Svetlana Sergeevna, Saratov State University

Introduction. Modern social challenges make it necessary to adapt the individual to rapidly changing conditions. The concept of generalized readiness of the individual is proposed as a socio-psychological construct that contributes to the effectiveness of such adaptation. Theoretical analysis. The article discusses domestic and foreign works describing the phenomenon of readiness, as well as constructs similar in content: vitality, resilience, tolerance to uncertainty. A comparative analysis of these concepts is carried out. The concept of generalized readiness is proposed as an attitude that presupposes a predisposition to certain social behavior and includes cognitive, motivational, emotional-volitional and behavioral components. The necessity of introducing the construct of generalized readiness for a wide range of social situations is substantiated, which represents a personal resource that helps to cope with situations of social challenge, uncertainty and maintain self-efficacy in changing conditions. The main content characteristics of a person’s generalized readiness are described. Conclusion. The analysis made it possible to formulate a definition of generalized readiness as a system of formed attitudes focused on effective life activity in conditions of uncertainty, manifested in a situation of interaction with Others, taking into account existing experience, self-esteem, ideas about one’s own competence and self-efficacy.

  1. Sanzhaeva R. D. Readiness and its psychological mechanisms. Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Obrazovanie. Lichnost. Obshchestvo [Buryat State University Bulletin. Education. Personality. Society], 2016, no. 2, pp. 6–16 (in Russian).
  2. Belavadi S., Hogg M. A. Social categorization and identity process in uncertainty management: The role of intragroup communication. In: Thye S. R., Lawler E. J., eds. Advances in group processes. Bingley, Emerald, 2019, рр. 61–77.
  3. Nestik T. A., Zhuravlev A. L. Psychological problems of joint activity regulation under uncertainty. In: Mobilis in mobili: lichnost v epokhu peremen [As molov A. G., ed. Mobilis in mobili: The psychology of changes]. Moscow, YaSK, 2018, pp. 226–244 (in Russian).
  4. Berger C. R., Bradac J. J. Language and social knowledge: Uncertainty in interpersonal relations. London, Edward Arnold, 1982. 151 p.
  5. Soldatova G. U., Shaigerova L. A. Reflection upon multiplicity of choice in psychology of intercultural communication. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya (Psychological studies), 2015, vol. 8, no. 40. Available at: https://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/article/view/561/299 (accessed 17 September 2023) (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v8i40.561
  6. Grigoryeva М. V. Components of a person’s social activity in situations of uncertainty and risk. Mir nauki. Pedagogika i psihologiya (World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology), 2019, vol. 7, no. 4. Available at: https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/52PSMN419.pdf (accessed 17 September 2023) (in Russian).
  7. Ryaguzova Е. V. The Script Adaptation of Foreign Students in Russia. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2018, vol. 18, iss. 1, pp. 63–73 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2018-18-1-63-73
  8. Ivanchin S. А., Konstantinov V. V. Features of adaptive readiness for educational activities of foreign students in the framework of higher education. Obshchestvo: sotsiologiya, psikhologiya, pedagogika (Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogy), 2021, no. 4 (84). Available at: https://disk.yandex.ru/i/_ueWzMb6RImlAw (accessed 17 September 2023) (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.24158/spp.2021.4.13
  9. Shamionov R. М. Adaptation Readiness of the Personality as a Subject of Social Interaction. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2015, vol. 15, iss. 4, pp. 106–112 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2015-15-4-106-112
  10. Chernousova Т. V. Strategies of responding to uncertainty as a subject of socio-psychological analysis. Psikhologiya cheloveka v obrazovanii [Psychology in Education], 2022, vol. 4, no. 4, рр. 421–434 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.33910/2686-9527-2022-4-4-421-434
  11. Asmolov A. G., Shehter E. D., Chernorizov A. M. Preadaptatsiya k neopredelennosti: nepredskazuemye marshruty evoljutsii [Pre-Adaptation to Uncertainty: Unpredictable Evolutionary Routes]. Moscow, Akropol, 2018. 212 p. (in Russian).
  12. Ferguson M. J. On becoming ready to pursue a goal you don’t know you have: Effects of nonconscious goals on evaluative readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2008, vol. 95, no. 6, рр. 12–68.
  13. Ferguson M. J., Wojnowicz M. T. The when and how of evaluative readiness: A social cognitive neuroscience perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2011, vol. 5, no. 12, рр. 1018–1038.
  14. Leonov I. N. Tolerance for ambiguity as a psychological phenomenon: The history of a construct. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya Filosofi ja. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika [Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy], 2014, no. 4, рр. 43–52 (in Russian).
  15. Freeston M. H., Tiplady A., Mawn L. Bottesi G., Thwaites S. Towards a model of uncertainty distress in the context of Coronavirus (COVID-19). The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 2020, vol. 13, article E31. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1754470x2000029x
  16. Hillen M. A., Caitlin M. G., Strout T. D. Smets E. M. A., Han P. K. J. Tolerance of uncertainty: Conceptual analysis, integrative model, and implications for healthcare. Social Science & Medicine, 2017, vol. 180, pp. 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/isocscimed2017.03.024
  17. Maddi S.R. On hardiness and other pathways to resilience. American Psychologist, 2005, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 261–262.
  18. Nenasheva M. V. The Phenomenon of Resilience in the Context of Contemporary Global Challenges. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye i sotsialnye nauki [Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series Humanitarian and Social Sciences], 2022, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 69–77 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V209
  19. Homenko I. A. On the issue of the formation of resistance in children in general educational practice. Vestnik Gertsenovskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Herzen University], 2011, no. 9, pp. 30–35 (in Russian).
  20. Selivanova О. А., Bystrova N. V., Derecha I. I., Mamontova T. S., Panfi lova О. V. Studying the phenomenon of resilience: Problems and prospects. Mir nauki. Pedagogika i psikhologiya (World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology), 2020, no. 3. Available at: https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/04PS