The Visual Space of a City: A Semiotic Approach
The article deals with the problem of visuality in the context of space from the point of view of visual semiotics. The choice of the problem determined the methodology, which is based on a semiotic approach. Visual semiotics uses induction as the main tool: analyzing individual elements of space, i.e. signs, it moves to the generalization of the results at the level of semiotics as a whole. The author believes that visual images captured in various architectural structures play an important role in shaping the social structure, the space of everyday communication, and the interaction practices of observing subjects. The purpose of the article is to characterize the basic principles of visual semiotics which reflect the theoretical understanding of urban architecture as a sign system. It is established that the main theoretical principles of visual semiotics in relation to space consist in the following provisions: first, visual artifacts which flood the city space are facts of communication, since they have a linguistic orientation and are perceived as signs. Secondly, the main property for a visual message is capacity – in a short period of time, the subject is able to perceive a much larger amount of information than from the text. And third, it is established that reading and generating new interpretations of urban space occur through everyday practices, during which the surrounding visual space is appropriated and personalized.
1. Mirzoeff N. How to see the world. New York, Basic Books, 2016. 352 p. (Russ. еd.: Mirzoev N. Kak smotret na mir. Moscow, Ad marginem Publ., 2019. 344 p.).
2. Sztompka P. Socjologia wizualna: fotografi a jako metoda badawcza. Warszawa, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 2005. 149 p. (Russ. еd.: Shtompka P. Vizualnaya so tsyologiya. Fotografiya kak metod issledovaniya. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2007. 200 p.).
3. Mitchell W. J. T. Iconoligy. Image. Text. Ideology. Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press, 1987. 226 p. (Russ. еd.: Mitchell U. Dzh. T. Ikonologiya. Obraz. Tekst. Ideologiya. Ekaterinburg, Kabinetnyy uchenyi Publ., 2017. 240 p.).
4. Lotman Yu. M. Semiosfera. Vnutri myslyashchikh mirov [Inside the thinking worlds]. St. Petersburg, Iskusstvo Publ., 2000. 704 p. (in Russian).
5. Eco U. Articulations of the Cinematic Code, Movies and Methods. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1976, pp. 590–607 (Russ. еd.: Eco U. O chleneniyakh kinematografi cheskogo koda. In: Stroenie fi lma. Nekotorye problemy analiza proizvedeniy ekrana). Moscow, Raduga Publ., 1985, pp. 79-101).
6. Avanesov S. S. Vizual semiotics of the city: perspective of the study of urban texts. Praksema. Problemy vizualnoy semiotiki [ Praxema. Problems of Visual Semiotics], 2016, no. 4, pp. 9-22 (in Russian).
7. Saussire F. de. Cours de linguistijue. Paris, Editions Payot and Revages, 2016. 426 p. (Russ. ed.: Sossyur F. de. Zametki po obshchey lingvistike. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1990. 280 p.).
8. Pers Ch. S. Izbrannye fi losovskie proizvedeniya [Principles of Philosophy]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2000. 412 p. (in Russian).
9. Bartes R. Mythologies. Paris, E ditions du Seuil, 1957. 191 p. (Russ. еd.: Bart R. Mifologii. Moscow, Izdatelstvo im. Sabashnikovykh, 1996. 314 p.).
10. Lotman Yu. M. Semiotics of culture and the consept of text. Trudy po znakovym sistemam [Works on Sign Systems], 1981, no. 9, pp. 7-26 (in Russian).
11. Avanesov S. S. What can be called visual semiotics? Praksema. Problemy vizualnoy semiotiki [Praxema. Problems of Visual Semiotics], 2014 , no. 1, pp. 10-22 (in Russian).
12. Arnheim R. Film as art. Be rkeley, University of California Press, 1957. 238 p. (Russ. еd.: Arnkheim R. Kino kak iskusstvo. Moscow, Izdatelstvo inostrannoi literatury, 1960. 173 p.).
13. Eco U. La struttura assente. Milano, T. Bompia ni, 1980. 425 p. (Russ. еd.: Eco U. Otsutstvuyushchaya struktura. St. Petersburg, Petropolis Publ., 1998. 432 p.).
14. Elkins J. The Visual Worlds: A Collection of Writing by James Elkins. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1972. 491 p. (Russ. еd.: Elkins Dzh. Issleduya vizualnyy mir. Vilnyus, EGU Publ., 2010. 534 p.).
15. Safonova A. V. The city is a living organism. Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta [The Bulletin of Irkutsk State Technical University], 2011, no.12, pp. 148-152 (in Russian).