Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy

ISSN 1819-7671 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1948 (Online)


Full text:
(downloads: 18)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
1(091)+17

Moral Problems in Russian Neo-Kantianism: The Specifics of the Formation of Transcendental Philosophy in Russia

Autors: 
Tetyuev Leonid I., Saratov State University
Vladimirov Pavel A., Branch of the Samara state University of railway transport in Saratov
Abstract: 

The article is devoted to the complex problem of the development of Russian Neo-Kantianism in the context of the history of transcendental philosophy. The general tendency of the development of transcendental philosophy in the form of “the history of motives”, identified on the basis of historical and philosophical analysis, is outlined. The formation of Russian Neo-Kantianism as an original creative direction is the result of its development in the context of German Neo-Kantian methodology and the pursuit of Russian philosophers for independent thinking. The specificity of moral issues and its originality are most clearly reflected in the writings of Russian Neo-Kantians, starting with A. I. Vvedensky. Nevertheless, the general vector of development of their views is consistent with European philosophical tradition. B. A. Focht and V. E. Sezeman deal with the problems of the transcendental method, and S. I. Hessen directs his efforts to the formation of the philosophy of education on the principles of critical idealism of I. Kant. The novelty of the study consists in the identification of the specifics of the Russian NeoKantian methodological approach in the context of the development of transcendental philosophy project. Particular attention is paid to the problem of the relationship between freedom and responsibility, the specifics of the disclosure of the “principle of obligation”. In conclusion, it is noted that a characteristic feature of Russian neo-Kantianism is the rethinking of the inextricability of a holistic worldview and the complementarity of three “Critics” of I. Kant.

Reference: 

1. Tetyuev L. I. Transtsendental’naya fi losofi ya: sovremennyy proyekt [Transcendental Philosophy: A Modern Project]. Saratov, Izdatelstvo Saratovskogo universiteta, 2001. 292 p. (in Russian).

2. Bely A. Dusha samosoznayushchaya [Self-aware soul]. Moscow, Kanon+ Publ., 2004. 560 p. (in Russian).

3. Akopova Yu. A. From symbol to simulacrum (by the material of Andrei Bely’s “Moscow text”). Filologicheskiye nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Philology. Theory and Practice], 2019, vol. 12, iss. 10, pp. 92–95 (in Russian).

4. Vvedensky A. I. O predelakh i priznakakh odushevleniya [On the limits and signs of animation]. Moscow, Kniga po trebovaniyu Publ., 2012. 119 p. (in Russian).

5. Dmitrieva N. A. Criticism or mysticism? A. I. Vvedensky and Russian Neo-Kantianism. In: Neokantianstvo v Rossii: Aleksandr Ivanovich Vvedenskiy, Ivan Ivanovich Lapshin [Neo-Kantianism in Russia: Alexander Ivanovich Vvedensky, Ivan Ivanovich Lapshin]. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ., 2013. pp. 40–73 (in Russian).

6. Vvedensky A. I. Opyt postroyeniya teorii materii na printsipakh kriticheskoy fi losofi i [Experience in building a theory of matter on the principles of critical philosophy]. Moscow, Librokom Publ., 2011. 352 p. (in Russian).

7. Foсht B. A. Izbrannoye (iz fi losofskogo naslediya) [Selected works (from philosophical heritage)]. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2003. 456 p. (in Russian).

8. Sezeman V. E. Ratsional’noye i irratsional’noye v sisteme fi losofi i [Rational and irrational in the philosophy of the system]. Logos. Mezhdunar. ezhegodnik po fi losofi i kultury [Logos. International yearbook on philosophy of culture]. Moscow, Tip. t-va A. A. Levenson, 1911, book 1, pp. 93–122 (in Russian).

9. Hessen S. I. Osnovy pedagogiki. Vvedeniye v prikladnuyu fi losofi yu [Fundamentals of pedagogy. Introduction to applied philosophy]. Moscow, Shkola-Press Publ., 1995. 448 p. (in Russian).