Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy

ISSN 1819-7671 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1948 (Online)


Full text:
(downloads: 11)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
141.72:140.8

Denial of motherhood as the ideological basis of the androcentric tradition

Autors: 
Kostritskaya Taisa Andreevna, Saratov State University
Abstract: 

Introduction. Androcentrism as an initial ideological attitude largely determines both the content of classical philosophical texts and the approaches of researchers to their interpretation. Theoretical analysis. It is noteworthy that androcentrism of "West" and "East" rests on the same ideological postulates. Their identifi cation is the purpose of this work. The way to identify them is a consistent answer to the question of how, in principle, is androcentrism possible as an ideological position that displaces to the periphery of humanity that part of it that pays the price with its own health, pain, and sometimes even life itself for its physical reproduction? Conclusions. It was revealed that the basis of androcentric ideology is the patriarchal theory of birth postulating the importance of the «seed». It is based on the three interrelated postulates, which in terms of content are patriarchal ideas about a woman which are based on the denial of her as an integral and autonomous being. This negation also defi nes the structure of the "private" sphere, thus determining both the worldview of individuals and the structure of society as a whole. This work is recommended for consideration by those researchers who seek to comprehend society as such and patriarchal society as its modern form.

Reference: 
  1. Grene D., Lattimore R., eds. The Complete Greek Tragedies. Aeschylus. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1959. 358 p. (Russ ed.: Aeschylus. Tragedii. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1989. 609 p.).
  2. Hobbes T. Leviathan, or the Matter, Forme and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiastical and Civil. New York, Touchstone, 1997. 511 p. (Russ. ed.: Hobbes T. Leviafan, ili materiya, forma i vlast gosudarstva tserkovnogo i grazhdanskogo. Hobbes T. Soch.: v 2 t. Moscow, Mysl' Publ., 1991, vol. 2. 731 p.).
  3. Rothman B. K. Recreating Motherhood. Ideology and Technology in a Patriarchal Society. New York, London, W.W. Norton & Company, 1989. 282 p.
  4. Aristotle. Generation of Animals. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1943. 708 p. (Russ. ed.: Aristotle. O vozniknovenii zhivotnyh. Moscow, Izdatelstvo Akademii nauk USSR, 1940. 250 p.).
  5. The Laws of Manu. London, Penguin Classics, 1992. 448 p. (Russ. ed.: Zakony Manu. Moscow, EKSMO-Press Publ., 2002. 496 p.).
  6. Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture. Old Testament I: Genesis 1-11. Downers Grove, IL, Inter Varsity Press, 2001. 256 p. (Russ. ed.: Bibleyskie kommentarii ottsov Tserkvi i drugikh avtorov I–VIII vekov. Vetkhiy Zavet. T. I: Kniga Bytiya 1-11. Tver', Germenevtika Publ., 2004. 304 p.).
  7. Gilman Ch. P. The Man-Made World: Or, Our Androcentric Culture. London, Leipsic, T. Fisher Unwin, 1911. 269 p.
  8. Hein H. Liberating Philosophy: An End to the Dichotomy of Matter and Spirit]. In: E. A. Ballaeva, ed. Zhenshchiny, poznanie i realnost: Issledovaniya po feministskoy fi losofi i [Women, Cognition and Reality: Studies in Feminist Philosophy]. Moscow, Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya Publ., 2005, pp. 338–360 (in Russian).
  9. Willekens H. Motherhood as a Legal Institution: A Historical-Sociological Introduction. In: E. H. Willekens, K. Scheiwe, T. Richarz, E. Schumann, eds. Motherhood and the Law. Gottingen, Universitatsverlag Gottingen, 2019, pp. 21–52.
  10. Pateman C. The Sexual Contract. Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1988. 264 p.
Received: 
12.09.2021
Accepted: 
25.03.2022
Published: 
30.06.2022