Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy

ISSN 1819-7671 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1948 (Online)
Full text:
download
(downloads: 10)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Psychology
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
316.6
DOI: 
10.18500/1819-7671-2022-22-2-188-196

Empirical model of youth social activity

Autors: 
Shamionov Rail Munirovich, Saratov State University
Abstract: 

Introduction. Studies of the social activity of young people allow us to find out the main trends of the real interest of young people in certain areas of social reality, to assess its potential for social development.Theoretical analysis.Today, a wealth of empirical material has been accumulated regarding its manifestations, factors and consequences, which requires generalization. The purpose of this study is to develop an empirical model of social activity of an individual. Results. A model of social activity of young people is presented, taking into account the conditions of their socialization, factors, situational characteristics of the present that determine the implementation of activity in a real or virtual environment, commitment and implementation of activity in mono- or multidirectional forms, personal, socio-psychological and social eff ects. The model includes a block of the structure of social activity built on the basis of exploratory and confi rmatory factor analysis, a block of external factors, a block of individual-personal factors and a block of personal eff ects of activity. Empirical data confi rming the main elements of the model and the connections between its various components are presented. Conclusions. It is concluded that social activity can be considered as a complex socio-psychological phenomenon, representing the eff ect of interaction of functional-dynamic, personal, subjective, socio-psychological and socio-cultural characteristics in a specifi c situation of human life in specifi c socio-historical circumstances of social development.

Key words: 
personality
social activity
youth
empirical model
Reference: 
  1. Mak-Daugall U. Osnovnye problemy social’noj psihologii [The Main Problems of Social Psychology]. Moscow, Kosmos Publ., 1916. 282 p. (in Russian).
  2. Trotsuk I. V., Sokhadze K. G., Lavrushina A. I. Noninstitutional formats of social activity of Russian youth (based on the results of expert and mass surveys). Gumanitarnye, social’no-jekonomicheskie i obshhestvennye nauki [Humanities, Socio-Economic and Social Sciences], 2016, no. 6–7, pp. 108–113 (in Russian).
  3. Shamionov R. M., Grigorieva M. V., Arendachuk I. V., Bocharova E. E., Usova N. V., Klenova M. A., Sharov A. A., Zagranichnyj A. I. Psihologija social’noj aktivnosti molodezhi [Psychology of Social Activity of Youth]. Moscow, Pero Publ., 2020. 200 p. (in Russian).
  4. Sokhadze K. G. Social activity of the Russian youth: The scope and restraining factors. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Sotsiologiya – RUDN Journal of Sociology, 2017, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 348–363 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2017-17-3-348-363
  5. Pegg K. J., O’Donnell A. W., Lala G., Barber B. L. The Role of Online Social Identity in the Relationship Between Alcohol-Related Content on Social Networking Sites and Adolescent Alcohol Use. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, 2018, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 50–55.
  6. Savrasova-V’un T. Social networks and their role in development of civic activity of the Ukrainian youth. Communication Today, 2017, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 104–112.
  7. Sherman L. E., Greenfi eld P. M., Hernandez L. M., Dapretto M. Infl uence Via Instagram: Effects on Brain and Behavior in Adolescence and Young Adulthood. Child Development, 2018, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 37–47.
  8. Liu Y., Shen W. Perching birds or scattered streams: a study of how trust affects civic engagement among university students in contemporary China. Higher Education, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00548-9
  9. Owusu-Agyeman Y., Fourie-Malherbe M. Students as partners in the promotion of civic engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1666263
  10. Fernandez J. S., Langhout R. Day Living on the Margins of Democratic Representation: Socially Connected Community Responsibility as Civic Engagement in an Unincorporated Area. American Journal of Community Psychology, 2018, vol. 62, no. 1–2, pp. 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12257
  11. Grant P. R., Bennett M., Abrams D. Using the SIRDE model of social change to examine the vote of Scottish teenagers in the 2014 independence referendum. British Journal of Social Psychology, 2017, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 455–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12186
  12. Shamionov R. M. Social Activity and Risk Propensity of Students with Autonomous and Dependent Types of Subject Regulation. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 2021, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 94–112 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2021120107
  13. Arendachuk I. V. Activity characteristics of social activity in young people belonging to different age groups. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Aсmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2020, vol. 9, iss. 2 (34), рр. 148–161 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2020-9-2-148-161
  14. Zagranichnyj A. I. The study of the subjective assessment of the infl uence of the features of communication in a virtual environment on communication in real life and the mechanism of transferring any personal traits, character accentuations, positions and behavioral strategies from the real environment to the virtual environment. Mir obrazovanija – obrazovanie v mire [World of Education – Education in the World], 2019, no. 2 (74), pp. 226–232 (in Russian).
  15. Sharov A. A. Deviant activity of youth: features and mechanism of transfer from the real environment to the virtual. Izvestija Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija Psihologija [News of IrkutskState University. Psychology Series], 2019, vol. 28, pp. 103–109 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.26516/2304-1226.2019.28.103
  16. Bocharova E. E. Representation of a person about cultural and historical facts and their role in determining social activity. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Serija: Psihologicheskie nauki [Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University. Series: Psychological Sciences], 2020, no. 1, pp. 22–35 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-7235-2020- 1-22-35
  17. Usova N. V. Psychodynamic predictors of the orientation of social activity. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija: Pedagogika. Psihologija. Sociokinetika [Bulletin of Kostroma State University. Series: Pedagogy. Psychology. Sociokinetics], 2019, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 95–100 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.34216/2073-1426-2019-25-3-95-100
  18. Grigoryeva M. V. Need-motivational factors of social activity of the individual in different conditions of socialization. Obshhestvo: sociologija, psihologija, pedagogika [Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogy], 2018, no. 11 (55), pp. 35–41 (in Russian)
  19. Klenova M. A. Motivation of protest and socio-political activity of an individual and its potential in the system of life-purposeorientations. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2021, vol. 10, iss. 1 (37), рр. 53–61 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2021-10-1-53-61
  20. Shamionov R. M., Grigorieva M. V., Grigoryev A. V. Volitional qualities as predictors of the importance of social activity of students. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 2019, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 18–34 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2019100102
  21. Shamionov R. M., Bocharova E. E., Nevsky E. V. The role of values in the commitment of youth to various types of social activity. Social Psychology and Society, 2022, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 124–141 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2022130108
  22. Shamionov R. M., Bocharova E. E., Nevsky E. V. Correlation of life orientations, social identity and social activity of youth. Rossiyskiy psihologicheskiy jurnal [Russian Psychological Journal], 2021, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 22–33 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2021.4.7
  23. Arendachuk I. V. Subject-activity determinants of types of social activity of students. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 2019, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 560–581. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2019-16-4-560-581
  24. Arendachuk I. V. Subjective determinants of social activity of the student youth. SHS Web Conf. “Trends in the development of psycho-pedagogical education in the conditions of transitional society” (ICTDPP-2019), 2019, vol. 70, pp. 5.
  25. Shamionov R. M., Bocharova E. E., Nevsky E. V. Characteristics of personality and activity of students as predictors of the degree of real and preferred participation in educational and developmental activities. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovaniya [Prospects of Science and Education], 2022, no. 1 (55), pp. 477–490 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2022.1.30
Received: 
30.01.2022
Accepted: 
25.03.2022
Published: 
30.06.2022