Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy

ISSN 1819-7671 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1948 (Online)


Full text:
(downloads: 42)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
[62:1]+1(430)+929Дессауэр
EDN: 
XNJTDD

Ontological foundations of technology in the concept of Friedrich Dessauer

Autors: 
Bogatov Mikhail Alexandrovich, Saratov State University
Kosykhin Vitaliy G., Saratov State University
Malkina Svetlana Mikhailovna, Saratov State University
Nevvazhay I. D., Saratov State Law Academy
Abstract: 

Introduction. In connection with the growing development of technology in the XX–XXI centuries the role and significance of theoretical reflection on how human dependence on technology transforms our everyday life are increasing. At the same time, two main strategies can be distinguished in relation to the rising influence of technology: critical (pessimistic) and “progressive” (optimistic). If the critical approach is constantly in the field of view of the humanities (starting with Ernst Junger, Oswald Spengler, Martin Heidegger), then the “progressive” one actually falls out of sight of modern researchers. The article is intended to appeal to the argument of one of the optimists, the concept of Friedrich Dessauer. Theoretical analysis. Friedrich Dessauer proceeds from an ontological model of understanding technology as the constant disclosure of the potential inherent in nature itself. Technology does not oppose nature, but continues and improves it in every possible way. Adhering to religious views, Dessauer says that technology continues the creation by God, and inventors and engineers act as co-creators of the divine plan. At the same time, the author sets out a rather abstract and mainly Kant-oriented idea of the structure of being and the place of a man in this being. Conclusion. Despite the fact that over the past 70 years, since the publication of Dessauer’s work, the face of the planet has changed significantly due to technical inventions, the argumentation of thinkers advocating both for and against the spread of technology has not actually changed: already in the 21st century we again and again encounter arguments proposed by Dessauer in 1958.

Reference: 
  1. Freyer H. Herrschaft, Planung und Technik. Aufsatze zur politischen Soziologie. Hrsg. und komm. von E. Uner. Weinheim, Acta humaniora, VCH Verlagsgesellschaft, 1987. 214 S.
  2. Levit S. Ya., compl. and ans. ed. Kul’turologiya XX vek: Antologiya [Cultural Studies of the 20th Century: An Anthology]. Moscow, Yurist, 1995. 703 p. (in Russian).
  3. Junger E. Der Arbeiter. Herrschaft und Gestalt. Stuttgart, Klett-Cotta, 2007. 300 S. (Russ. ed.: Junger E. Rabochij. Gospodstvo i geshtal‘t. St. Petersburg, Nauka, 2000. 539 p.)
  4. Junger F. G. Die Perfektion der Technik. Frankfurt am Main 8, Aufl age. Vittorio Klostermann GmbH, 2010. 372 S. (Russ. ed.: Junger F. G. Sovershenstvo tekhniki. Mashina i sobstvennost’. St. Petersburg, Vladimir Dal’, 2002. 564 p.).
  5. Heidegger M. Vortrage und Aufsatze. Frankfurt am Main 8, Auflage. Vittorio Klostermann GmbH, 2000. 300 S. (Russ. ed.: Heidegger M. Vremya i bytie. Stat’i i vystupleniya. Moscow, Respublika, 1993. 447 p.).
  6. Benjamin W. Gesammelte Schriften I (2). Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 1972. 1275 S. (Russ. ed.: Benjamin W. Uchenie o podobii. Mediaesteticheskie proizvedeniya. Moscow, RGGU Publ., 2012. 288 p.).
  7. Dessauer Fr. Streit um die Technik. Frankfurt am Main, Knecht, 1956. 471 S. (Russ. ed.: Dessauer Fr. Spor o tekhnike. Samara, Samarskaya gumanitarnaya akademiya Publ., 2017. 266 p.).
  8. Dupuy J.-P. La Marque du sacre : essai sur une denegation. Paris, Carnets Nord, 2009. 279 p. (Russ. ed.: Dupuy J.-P. Znak svyashchennogo. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2021. 272 p.).
  9. Hui Y. Art and Cosmotechnics. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 2021. 318 p. (Russ. ed.: Hui Y. Iskusstvo i kosmotekhnika. Moscow, Led, 2023. 384 p.).
  10. Hui Y. The Question Concerning Technology in China: An Essay in Cosmotechnics. Falmouth, Urbanomic, 2017. 340 p. (Russ. ed.: Hui Y. Vopros o tekhnike v Kitae. Moscow, Ad Marginem, 2023. 320 p.).
Received: 
19.10.2023
Accepted: 
13.11.2023
Published: 
25.12.2023