Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy

ISSN 1819-7671 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1948 (Online)


For citation:

Duplinskya Y. M., Steklova I. V. The question of the qualitative definiteness of the bit in the natural and artificial intelligence. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2024, vol. 24, iss. 1, pp. 36-40. DOI: 10.18500/1819-7671-2024-24-1-36-40, EDN: QLPXNF

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 23)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
004.8+111.32
EDN: 
QLPXNF

The question of the qualitative definiteness of the bit in the natural and artificial intelligence

Autors: 
Duplinskya Yuliya Mikhailovna, Saratov State University
Steklova Irina V., Saratov State Technical University
Abstract: 

Introduction. Advances in digital technology lead to the tendency to adjust the modern education system under the algorithms of artificial intelligence. In this regard the special relevance is acquired by a research of those aspects of human thinking which are not amenable to modeling in artificial intelligence systems. Theoretical analysis. In the concepts of the XX–XXI centuries eidos is transformed into a dynamic pattern. Patterns, unlike eidos-forms of ancient philosophy, fi x not a static, but a dynamic form of a reproducible motion configuration. Patterns, like Plato’s eidos, are indivisible integrities that are not reduced to discrete elements of discourse. It is justified that the eidos configurations are formed not at the macro level of the gestalt, but at the micro level of the bit. The primary “not indifferent differences” of the bits of human intelligence are modifications of the initial organism dichotomy “organism – environment” (“inside – outside”, “inclusion in – ejection from”), differing from the bits of the binary code (1–0) of digital technology. Conclusion. It is concluded that the basic gestalts of creative thinking (“figure – background”) is not a secondary “emergent” quality of integrative integrity, but an elementary and irreducible “primary quality” of human intelligence bits.

Reference: 
  1. Florenskiy P. The Names. In: Florenskiy P. Imena [The Names]. Moscow, Eksmo-Press, 1998, pp. 449–663 (in Russian).
  2. Capra F. The web of life. New York, Anchor books. Adivision of random house, INC, 1996. 368 р. (Russ. ed.: Capra F. Pautina zhizni. Moscow, ID Gelios, 2002. 336 p.).
  3. Abraham R. H., Shaw C. D. Dynamics: The geometry of behavior. Redwood City, California, Addison-Wesley, 1992. 653 р.
  4. Hunt H. On the nature of consciousness. Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1995. 358 р. (Russ. ed.: Hunt H. O prirode soznaniya. Moscow, AST, 2004. 555 p.).
  5. Chalmers D. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. New York, Oxford University Press, 1996. 414 p. (Russ. ed.: Chalmers D. Soznayushchiy um: v poiskakh fundamental’noy teorii. Moscow, URSS, 2015. 512 p.).
  6. Anderson O. R. Comparative protozoology: Ecology, physiology, life history. Berlin, Springer Science, 2013. 482 p.
  7. Popkov V. V. G. Spencer-Brown's arithmetic of consciousness. Ontologiya proektirovaniya [Ontology of Designing], 2015, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 85–107 (in Russian)
Received: 
22.10.2023
Accepted: 
12.01.2023
Published: 
29.03.2024