Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy

ISSN 1819-7671 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1948 (Online)

For citation:

Grigoryeva M. V., Shamionov R. M. Methodological approaches to the study of adaptive readiness of subjects of higher education. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2024, vol. 24, iss. 4, pp. 421-429. DOI: 10.18500/1819-7671-2024-24-4-421-429, EDN: RZMGFO

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
download
(downloads: 103)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Psychology
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
[159.923+378.01]-057.875
DOI: 
10.18500/1819-7671-2024-24-4-421-429
EDN: 
RZMGFO

Methodological approaches to the study of adaptive readiness of subjects of higher education

Autors: 
Grigoryeva Marina Vladimirovna, Saratov State University
Shamionov Rail Munirovich, Saratov State University
Abstract: 

Introduction. The problem of adaptive readiness of students is in a state of active development and search for methodological foundations of research. It is necessary to identify the research potential of the most commonly used methodological approaches in psychology to the study of adaptive readiness of the individual. Theoretical analysis. Studying adaptation readiness as a holistic system, we can talk about psychophysiological, psychological and socio-psychological adaptation readiness. Adaptation readiness of participants in educational relations within the subjective approach characterizes the subject as a bearer of not just activity, but activity in integra ting various mental formations, starting with temperament and ending with the experience of adaptation in various existential spaces. An ecopsychological approach to the study of the adaptive readiness of educational subjects allows us to identify the discrepancy between environmental requirements and internal capabilities, transform relationships in the “personality – environment” system, conduct reflection and form adaptive readiness for the future. Conclusion. System-structural analysis helps to understand the complex and multi-level organization of adaptive readiness of students. The subjective approach focuses on the activity of students in the functioning of their adaptive readiness. The ecopsychological approach directs the research to the study of the conditions and mechanisms of adaptive readiness in the “personality-educational environment” system.

Key words: 
adaptive readiness
higher education students
systemic-structural approach
subjective approach
eco-psychological approach
Reference: 
  1. Grigoreva М. V. Conceptual apparatus of psychology of personality adaptation. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2014, vol. 3, iss. 3 (11), pp. 259–263 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2014-3-3-259-262
  2. Vagapova A. R., Bolbot T. L. Adaptation readiness of first-graders in assessments of participants in the educational process. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2015, vol. 4, iss. 3 (15), pp. 271–276 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2015-4-3-271-275
  3. Khmelkova O. V. Psychological and pedagogical conditions for the formation of adaptive readiness of students at transitional stages of the educational process. Obshchestvo: sotsiologiya, psikhologiya, pedagogika [Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogics], 2017, no. 10, pp. 76–79 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.24158/spp.2017.10.14
  4. Sharov A. A. Study of adaptive readiness of students with disabilities: Problem statement. Universum: psihologiya i obrazovanie [Universum: Psychology and education: еlectronic scientific journal], 2020, no. 4 (70), pp. 23–24. Available at: http://7universum.com/ru/psy/archive/item/9182 (accessed September 24, 2024) (in Russian).
  5. Sharov A. A., Khmelkova O. V. Adaptation readiness of students with disabilities and their normally developing peers in the 1st year of study (comparative context). Mir pedagogiki i psihologii [The world of pedagogy and psychology], 2021, no. 7 (60), pp. 45–49 (in Russian).
  6. Ivanchin S. A., Konstantinov V. V. Features of adaptive readiness for educational activities of foreign students in the context of higher education. Obshchestvo: sotsiologiya, psikhologiya, pedagogika [Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogics], 2021, no. 4 (84), pp. 78–83 (in Russian).
  7. Grigoriev A. V. Comparative analysis of the characteristics of adaptive readiness in students in conditions of manifestation of different types of social activity. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya [Modern problems of science and education], 2016, no. 6, pp. 451. Available at: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=25934 (accessed September 24, 2024) (in Russian).
  8. Usova N. V. Theoretical foundations of optimal adaptation readiness in a migration situation. Pis’ma v Emissiya. Offlayn [The Emissia Offl ine Letters], 2017, no. 7, p. 2540. Available at: http://emissia.org/offline/2017/2540.htm (accessed September 24, 2024) (in Russian).
  9. Shamionov R. M. Adaptive readiness of the individual – the subject of social interaction. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2015, vol. 15, iss. 4, pp. 106–112 ( in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2015-15-4-106-112
  10. Grigoryeva M. V. Types of adaptive readiness of the individual in the educational environment of the school. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2018, vol. 7, iss. 1 (25), pp. 56–61 (i n Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2018-7-1-56-61
  11. Khmelkova O. V. Structural components of adaptive readiness and psychological and pedagogical conditions of its formation: Dynamic aspect. Mir nauki. Pedagogika i psikhologiya [World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology], 2017, vol. 5, no. 5, p. 60 (i n Russian).
  12. Sharov A. A., Khmelkova O. V. Integrative structural components of adaptive readiness of students with disabilities. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovaniya [Perspectives of Science and Education], 2021, no. 3 (51), pp. 290–301 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2021.3.20
  13. Shamionov R. M. The structure of the adaptive readiness of the individual. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2016, vol. 16, iss. 4, pp. 454–458 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2016-16-4-454-458
  14. Karpov A. V. Regularities of structural-level organization of professionally important personality traits. In: Metodologiya sovremennoy psikhologii [Kozlova V. V., Karpova A.V., Mazilova V. A., Petrenko V. F., eds. Methodology of modern psychology]. Moscow, Yaroslavl, YarSU, LKIISI RAS, MAPN, 2017, vol. 7, pp. 145–160 (in R ussian).
  15. Grigoryeva M. V. Psychodiagnostic technique “Adaptive readiness of the individual”. Obshchestvo: sotsiologiya, psikhologiya, pedagogika [Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogics], 2017, no. 10, pp. 73–75 (in Russ ian).
  16. Sergienko E. A. Psikhicheskoe razvitie s pozitsiy sistemno-sub”ektnogo podkhoda [Mental development from the standpoint of the system-subjective approach]. Moscow, Publ. House “Institute of Psychology RAS”, 2021. 279 p. (in Russian).
  17. Ryabikina Z. I. Subject-existential approach to the study of personality-developing contradictions. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological Journal], 2008, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 78–87 (in Russian).
  18. Panov V. I. Ecopsykhology: Paradigmalnyy metod [Ecopsychology: Paradigmatic search]. Moscow; St. Petersburg, Psychological Institute of the Russian Academy of Education Publ., Nestor-History, 2014. 304 p. (in Russian).
  19. Znakov V. V. Psikhologiya vozmozhnogo: Novoe napravlenie issledovaniy ponimaniya [Psychology of the Possible: A New Direction in Research of Understanding]. Moscow, Institut psihologii RAN Publ., 2020. 365 p. (in Russian).
  20. Panov V. I. Ecopsychological approach to the development of the psyche: stages, prerequisites, constructs. Teoreticheskaya i eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Theoretical and Experimental Psychology], 2022, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 100–117 (in Russia n). https://doi.org/10.24412/2073-0861-2022-3-100-117
  21. Kaptsov A. V., Panov V. I. Personal qualities of the subject as predictors of ecopsychological types of interaction in activities and communication. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Experimental Psychology], 2019, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 72–80 (in Russian ). https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2019120406
  22. Bulatova T. A., Kaptsov A. V., Kolesnikova E. I. Features of ecopsychological types of interaction of students with the educational environment of the university in the context of digitalization. Vestnik Samarskoy gumanitarnoy akademii. Seriya: Psikhologiya [Bulletin of the Samara Humanitarian Academy. Series: Psychology], 2019, no. 2 (26), pp. 29–52 (in Russian) .
  23. Panov V. I., Kalinin I. V. Ecopsychological approach to the analysis of intersubjective interactions. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvistiches kogo universiteta. Obrazovanie i pedagogicheskie nauki [Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanities], 2021, no. 3 (840), pp. 221–232 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.52070/2500-3488_2021_3_840_221
  24. Grigoryeva M. V. Adaptation mechanisms of the process of socio-cultural integration. In: Sotsiokul'turnaya integratsiya i spetsial'noe obrazovanie [Sociocultural integration and special education]. Saratov, Saratov State University Publ., 2015, pp. 37–42 (in Russian).
Received: 
08.08.2024
Accepted: 
20.09.2024
Published: 
25.12.2024