Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy

ISSN 1819-7671 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1948 (Online)


For citation:

Koval E. G., Yasvin V. A. Environmental factors of critical thinking formation in lower secondary school students. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2025, vol. 25, iss. 1, pp. 67-73. DOI: 10.18500/1819-7671-2025-25-1-67-73, EDN: UCJSET

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 1)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
373.01.02
EDN: 
UCJSET

Environmental factors of critical thinking formation in lower secondary school students

Autors: 
Koval Elena G., Moscow City University
Yasvin Vitold A., Moscow City University
Abstract: 

Introduction. Critical thinking is increasingly in demand in professional activities and private life, however, education systems do not fully answer to the request of its formation yet. The main solution is usually considered to be the implementation of exercises on critical thinking in subject classes. Practice shows that effective implementation of such exercises requires the formation of an educational environment in which initiative and independent activity of a student are encouraged. Theoretical analysis. The importance of the environmental factor might be explained by Self-determination theory: satisfying a child’s need for autonomy contributes to academic motivation, which mediates the influence of the environment on achieving meta-subject educational results. Empirical analysis. The connection between modality of school environment and levels of critical thinking of 7th grade students is considered. The correlation of the number of students at the «advanced» and “developing” levels with a type of environment identified on the basis of two scales, freedom and activity, is shown. Conclusion. The results of the study confirm the importance of environmental stimulation of activity for the formation of critical thinking in secondary school, especially in combination with freedom, i.e. personalization, priority of personal interests, possibilities for independence of judgments, choices and actions.

Reference: 
  1. OECD. Trends Shaping Education 2013. OECD Publishing, Paris, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1787/trends_edu2013-en
  2. Dorn E., Hall S., Ibrahim H., Sarfraz S., Schmautzer D., Tmiri S. The skills revolution and the future of learning and earning. World Government Summit, 2023. 49 p.
  3. OECD. Trends Shaping Education 2022. OECD Publishing, Paris, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1787/6ae8771a-en
  4. Van Damme D., Zahner D., eds. Does Higher Education Teach Students to Think Critically? OECD Publishing, Paris, 2022. 267 p. https://doi.org/10.1787/cc9fa6aa-en
  5. Pogrow S. HOTS Revisited: A thinking development approach to reducing the learning gap after grade 3. Phi Delta Kappan, 2005, vol. 87, iss. 1, pp. 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170508700111
  6. Barnett J. E., Francis A. L. Using higher order thinking questions to foster critical thinking: A classroom study. Educational Psychology, 2012, vol. 32, iss. 2, pp. 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2011.638619
  7. McCollister K., Sayler M. Lift the ceiling: Increase rigor with critical thinking skills. Gifted Child Today, 2010, vol. 33, iss. 1, pp. 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/107621751003300110
  8. Pinskaya M. A., Mikhaylova A. M., Rydze O. A., Denishcheva L. O., Krasnyanskaya K. A., Avdeenko N. A. Skills of the XXI century: How to form and evaluate in the lesson? Obrazovatelnaya politika [Educational Policy], 2019, no. 3, pp. 50–62 (in Russian). Available at: https://edpolicy.ranepa.ru/form-and-evaluate (accessed February 23, 2024). EDN: RWPFEX
  9. Pinskaya M. A., Mihaylova A. M. Kompetentsii “4K”: sredovye resheniya dlya shkoly. Prakticheskie rekomendatsii: uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie [“4C” competencies: Environmental solutions for schools. Practical recommendations: An educational and methodical manual]. Moscow, Rossiyskiy uchebnik, 2020. 95 p. (in Russian).
  10. Tihomirova O. V. Professional defi ciencies of teachers in the formation of 4k schoolchildren: First steps in overcoming. Obrazovatelnaya politika [Educational Policy], 2019, no. 3 (79), pp. 44–49 (in Russian). Available at: https://edpolicy.ranepa.ru/teacher-as-facilitator (accessed February 23, 2024). EDN: YUDAIW
  11. Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. Self-determination theory. Basic psychological needs in motivation, development and wellness. New York, Guilford Press, 2017. 756 p.
  12. Koreshnikova Yu. N., Avdeeva E. A. Interest Cannot Be Forced. The Role of Academic Motivation and Teaching Styles in the Development of Students’ Critical Thinking. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Educational Studies Moscow], 2022, no. 3, pp. 36–66 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2022-3-36-66
  13. Kwan Y. W., Wong A. F. Effects of the constructivist learning environment on students’ critical thinking ability: Cognitive and motivational variables as mediators. International Journal of Educational Research, 2015, vol. 70, pp. 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.02.006
  14. Norris S. P. The meaning of critical thinking test performance: The effects of abilities and dispositions on scores. In: Fasko D., ed. Critical Thinking and Reasoning: Current Research, Theory and Practice. Cresskill, NJ, Hampton, 2003, pp. 315–329.
  15. Perkins D. N., Jay E., Tishman S. Beyond Abilities: A Dispositional Theory of Thinking. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1993, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1–21.
  16. Rosas G. Glossary of Key Terms on Learning and Training for Work. International Labour Office. International Training Centre of the ILO, 2006. 68 p.
  17. Winterton J., Delamare Le Deist F., Stringfellow E. Typology of Knowledge, Skills, and Competences: Clarifi cation of the Concept and Prototype. Cedefop Reference Series 64. Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2006. Available at: https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/files/3048_en.pdf (accessed February 23, 2024).
  18. Uznadze D. N. Eksperimentalnye osnovy psikhologii ustanovki [Experimental foundations of the psychology of attitudes]. Tbilisi, Academy of Sciences of the Georgian SSR, 1961. 210 p. (in Russian).
  19. Asmolov A. G. At the crossroads of ways to study the human psyche: The unconscious, attitude, activity. In: Khrestomatiya po kursu «Vvedenie v psikhologiyu»: uche bnoe posobie [Sokolova E. E., ed. Textbook on the course “Introduction to psychology”]. Moscow, Russian Psy chological Society Publ., 1999, pp. 181–192 (in Russian).
  20. Ritchhart R. Creating cultures of thinking. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass, 2015. 367 p.
  21. Uglanova I. L., Orel E. A., Brun I. V. Measuring creativity and critical thinking in primary school. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological Journal], 2020, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 96–107 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.31857/S020595920011124-2
  22. Uglanova I. L., Brun I. V., Vasin G. M. EvidenceCentered Design method for measuring complex psychological constructs. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya [Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology], 2018, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 18–27 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2018070302
  23. Yasvin V. A. Shkolnaya sreda kak predmet izmereniya: ekspertiza, proektirovanie, upravlenie [The school environment as a measurement subject: Expertise, design, management]. Moscow, Narodnoe obrazovanie, 2019. 448 p. (in Russian).
Received: 
05.03.2024
Accepted: 
16.01.2025
Published: 
31.03.2025