Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy

ISSN 1819-7671 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1948 (Online)

Full text:
(downloads: 21)
Article type: 

Bioethical Judgments about Genetic Engineering

Kazenov Dmitry K., Saratov State University

This article discusses the ethical judgments about human genetic engineering. Considered opinions include consequentialist judgments and categorical judgments. Judgments are being analyzed in the emotivist approach. The article concludes that there is no enough empirical knowledge for an adequate judgment on the prospects of human genetic engineering, while the existing judgments are being associated with exaggerated assumptions, bordering on dystopian fiction, and metaphysical concepts.

1. Hayry M. Categorical objections to genetic engineering -a critique//Ethics and Biotechnology/eds. A. Dyson, J. Harris. L.; N.Y., 1994. Р. 202-215.  
2. Holm S. Genetic engineering and the north-south divide//Ibid. Р. 47-63.  
3. Stevenson С. The Emotive Meaning of Ethical Terms//Mind. New Series. 1937. Jan. Vol. 46, № 181. Р. 14-31.  
4. Фукуяма Ф. Наше постчеловеческое будущее: последствия биотехнологической революции. М., 2004. С. 146-147.     
5. Ayer A. Language, Truth and Logic. L., 2001.  
6. Барбур И. Этика в век технологии. М., 2001. С. 270.  
7. Хабермас Ю. Будущее человеческой природы: На пути к либеральной евгенике? М., 2002. С. 36-37.