Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy

ISSN 1819-7671 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1948 (Online)


Full text:
(downloads: 24)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
37.013.41
EDN: 
SAUTHQ

Creativity and innovativeness of the subject of labor in the new socio-economic conditions

Autors: 
Zakharova Lyudmila Nikolaevna, Nizhny Novgorod State University. NI Lobachevsky
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article analyzes the factors that create a demand for innovative development of the economy: the low level of innovativeness and labor productivity, the growth of bureaucracy in management. The demand of innovative economy for creative personnel is discussed. Theoretical analysis. It is shown that enterprises and organizations do not need so much creative as innovative personnel who may not participate in the creation of something new, but are busy implementing and adopting rapidly developing and fundamentally changing production and managerial technologies. Such personnel can work without distress in the organizational environment with the characteristics of instability, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity typical of the VUCA world. The use of theoretical modeling method allowed to develop a typology of personality with a combination of qualities of creativity and innovativeness: conservator, adaptor, creator of ideas and creative innovator, their characteristics are given. The key role of adaptors and creative innovators for enterprises of innovation economy is shown. The author considers the existing limits of personality formation with creative and innovative qualities. Conclusion. The characteristics of organizational culture that contributes to the development of personnel innovativeness were defined. The approaches to the improvement of corporate training, which removes the barriers of innovativeness are proposed.

Reference: 
  1. Johansen B., Euchner J. Navigating the VUCA world. Research-Technology Management, 2013, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 10–15. https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5601003
  2. Dutta S., Lanvin L.R. B., Leon L. R., Wunsch-Vincent S., eds. Global Innovation Index 2022. Cornell SC Johnson College of Business, 2022. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/global_innovation_index/en/2022/ (accessed 12 May 2023).
  3. Pandey M. K., Shekhawat K. K., Sergeeva I., Orlova O. A nexus among technology input, research activity, innovation, and economic growth: A vis-avis analysis between Asia and Europe. HSE Economic Journal, 2023, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 122–147. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8691-2023-27-1-122-147
  4. Fossen F., Sorgner A. Mapping the future of occupations: transformative and destructive effects of new digital technologies on jobs. Foresight and STI Governance, 2019, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 10–18. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2019.2.10.18
  5. Volgin A. D., Gimpel’son V. E. Demand for Skills: Analysis Using Online Vacancy Data. Ekonomicheskij zhurnal VSHE [HSE Economic Journal], 2022, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 343–374. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8691-2022-26-3-343-374 (in Russian).
  6. Bogoyavlenskaya D. B. Psikhologiya tvorcheskikh sposobnostej [Psychology of Creative Abilities]. Moscow, Akademiya, 2002. 320 p. (in Russian).
  7. Shumpeter J. Teoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya: kapitalizm, socializm i demokratiya [Theory of Economic Development: Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy]. Moscow, Eksmo, 2007. 864 р. (in Russian).
  8. Yagolkovskiy S. R. Relationships among individuallevel correlates of innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 2019, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 196–207. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-12-2017-0133
  9. Fixsen D., Blase K., Metz A., van Dyke M. Implementation Science. In: Wright J. D., ed. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. 2nd edition. Oxford, Elsevier, 2015, vol. 11, pp. 695–702.
  10. Zakharova L. N., Leonova I. S. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskiy vozrast personala rossijskikh kompaniy [Socio-Psychological Age of Russian Companies’ Personnel]. Moscow, INFRA-M, 2021. 292 p. (in Russian).
  11. Duchek S. Organizational resilience: A capability-based conceptualization. Business Research, 2020, no. 13, pp. 215–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7
  12. Lee A., Legood A., Hughes D., Tian A. W., Newman A., Knigh C. Leadership, creativity and innovation: A meta-analytic review. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2020, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1661837
  13.  
Received: 
23.05.2023
Accepted: 
09.06.2023
Published: 
29.09.2023