Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy

ISSN 1819-7671 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1948 (Online)


For citation:

Shatkin M. A. The problem of value in the digital society of swarm intelligence. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2024, vol. 24, iss. 3, pp. 300-304. DOI: 10.18500/1819-7671-2024-24-3-300-304, EDN: LGRKRI

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 34)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
[004:316.4]+[1:316]+179
EDN: 
LGRKRI

The problem of value in the digital society of swarm intelligence

Autors: 
Shatkin Maxim Alexandrovich, Saratov State University
Abstract: 

Introduction. The emerging digital society demonstrates the problem of justifying the value, worth and price of digital products and services, which requires consideration of the specificity of value in this society. Theoretical analysis. Following the financial and art market, the boundary between “value” and “worth” is blurred in the digital society. Value, including the value of an individual, becomes variable and is conditioned by the presence of unique attributes and unique experiences that obtain market value. At the same time, under standard digital protocols and technologies, the true uniqueness of an individual experience can only be achieved through the creation of customized digital ecosystems in the form of robotic swarms that support human life activities. A set of digital devices that have sufficient resources to continuously self-renew and form a closed environment around the individual that provides a unique experience can be called a chrysalic swarm. The chrysalic swarm creates an opportunity for the individual to escape from the logic of mutual competition dictated by society. Conclusion. Studying the value problematization in the digital society of swarm intelligence opens a theoretical perspective on the problem of the crisis of social elites in the context of the fulfillment of this scenario of society development.

Reference: 
  1. Herzog L. Citizens’ autonomy and corporate cultural power. Journal of Social Philosophy, 2020, vol. 51, iss. 2, pp. 205–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12310
  2. Hänel H. C., Haslanger S., Kroeger O. Analyzing social wrongs. Journal of Social Philosophy, 2022, vol. 53, iss. 4, pp. 448–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12505
  3. Shatkin M. A. The problem of privacy in the digital society of swarm intelligence. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2024, vol. 24, iss. 1, pp. 62–66 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2024-24-1-62-66
  4. Mazzucato M. The Value of All Things. Creation and Withdrawal in the Global Economy. Allen Lane, Penguin Random House UK, 2018. 312 p. (Russ. ed.: Mazzucato M. Tsennost vsekh veshchey. Sozdanie i izyatie v mirovoy ekonomike. Moscow, HSE Publishing House, 2021. 408 p.).
  5. Graw I. Der große Preis: Kunst zwischen Markt und Celebrity-Kultur. DuMont, 2008. 160 S. (Russ. ed.: Graw I. Vysokaya tsena. Iskusstvo mezhdu rynkom i kul’turoy znamenitosti. Moscow, Ad Marginem Press, 2008. 169 p.).
  6. Vakkuri J., Johanson J. E. (eds.). Hybrid governance, organisations and society: Value creation perspectives. Abingdon, Routledge, 2021. 268 p.
  7. Boltanski L., Esquerre A. Enrichissement. Une critique de la merchandise. Paris, Gallimard, 2017. 672 p. (Russ. ed.: Boltanski L., Esquerre A. Obogashchenie. Kritika tovara. Moscow, St. Petersburg, Institut Gaydara Publ., 2021. 600 p.).
  8. Boltanski L., Teveno L. De là justifi cation. Les économies de la grandeur. Paris, Gallimard, 1991. 496 p. (Russ. ed.: Boltanski L., Teveno L. Kritika i obosnovanie spravedlivosti. Moscow, Novoye Literaturnoe Obozrenie, 2013. 576 p.).
Received: 
04.01.2024
Accepted: 
03.06.2024
Published: 
30.09.2024