Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy

ISSN 1819-7671 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1948 (Online)


For citation:

Bunyaev M. B. The correlation between freedom and violence as one of the fundamental problems of thinking. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2024, vol. 24, iss. 1, pp. 30-35. DOI: 10.18500/1819-7671-2024-24-1-30-35, EDN: PAKEJQ

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 23)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
123+1(4+470+571)(09)+929
EDN: 
PAKEJQ

The correlation between freedom and violence as one of the fundamental problems of thinking

Autors: 
Bunyaev Maxim B., Saratov State University
Abstract: 

Introduction Themain topic of this article is the method of solving a fundamental problem of the relationship between a man and the world. The author proposes to accept the concepts of violence and freedom as such horizons of relations, because these concepts can be understood as main plots of human conscious life. They also may be the sides of the dialectical confrontation. The present study uses the onto-hermeneutic method combined with a historico-philosophical analysis. Theoretical analysis In the course of work, we considered and made clear the concepts of questioning and inquiring, of liberty and freedom, and of violence. Special attention will be paid to clarifying the acceptance of conditions of some question as a fundamental problem. Among them there are: the necessity of occurrence, conditionality of perception for consciousness from the pattern of consciousness, dependence of the way of life on the manner of asking and solving this question. The author claims that the question of the correlation between violence and freedom is a fundamental problem of human activity. During this clarification, the concepts of violence and freedom are explicated in the works of K. Marx and F. Engels, G. V. Plekhanov, B. Spinoza, and Aristotle. Conclusion. In the course of meditation the author offered a number of interconnected definitions of freedom and violence, and concluded on the need for recognizing violence as a systematic phenomenon of social reality. Violence pervades all history of humanity, and can bereflected in the history of thinking and art.

Reference: 
  1. Mamardashvili M. K. Lektsii po antichnoy filosofii [Lectures on Ancient philosophy]. Chekhov, AO “Pervaya Obraztsovaya tipografiya”, filial “Chekhovskiy Pechatnyy Dvor”, 2016. 216 p. (in Russian).
  2. Heidegger M. What is metaphysics? In: Heidegger M. Vremya i bytie: Stat'i i vystupleniya [Time and Being: Articles and Speeches]. Moscow, Respublika, 1993, pp. 16–27 (in Russian).
  3. Marks K., Engel’s F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Essays: in 50 vols.]. Moscow, Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo politicheskoy literatury, 1960, vol. 23. 908 p. (in Russian).
  4. Ragozin N. P. On the role of violence in history and the conditions for overcoming it: Social and philosophical analysis. Kul’tura i tsivilizatsiya [Culture and Civilization], 2020, no. 2 (12), pp. 11–17 (in Russian).
  5. Spinoza B. Sochineniya: v 2 t. [Essays: in 2 vols. Vol. 1]. St. Petersburg, Nauka, 1999. 489 p.
  6. Plekhanov G. V. Izbrannye filosofskie proizvedeniya: v 5 t. [Selected Philosophical Works: in 5 vols. Vol. 2]. Moscow, Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo politicheskoy literatury, 1956. 824 p. (in Russian).
  7. Aristotel’. Metafi zika [Metaphysics]. Moscow, Institut filosofi i, teologii i istorii sv. Fomy Publ., 2006. 232 p. (in Russian).
Received: 
14.05.2023
Accepted: 
12.01.2024
Published: 
29.03.2024