Cite this article as:

Kraynov A. L. The Values of the Posthuman Future: the Problem of Choice. Izvestiya Saratovskogo Universiteta. New seria. Seria Phylosophy. Psychology. Pedagogics, 2019, vol. 19, iss. 1, pp. 16-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2019-19-1-16-20


Heading: 
UDC: 
101.1:14
Language: 
Russian

The Values of the Posthuman Future: the Problem of Choice

The article is devoted to the analysis of the postmodern philosophical reflection of the problem of posthumanity, in the aspect of analyzing the interrelation between the development of robotics and the increase in tendencies to asexuality. The philosophy of postmodernism, the world view of transhumanism and the philosophical views of cyberfeminism contributed to the formation and development of a new posthumanistic value system, replacing man with some kind of asexual monster, combining a mixture of man, animal and machine. The ideal of philosophical posthumanism is the triumph of a posthuman, who combines many disguises in his body, who is dissolved in the Internet, being partly a cyborg, who is able to change his gender at will or does not have it at all. On the one hand, the values of posthumanism are actualized in the form of human depersonalization in the Internet and its merging with a machine-computer/smartphone, on the other, in the creation of humanoid robots-androids possessing the germs of artificial intelligence entering into intimate and legal relations with man. Thus, human society gradually ceases to be traditional, accepting into its value system new post-values, flirting thus not so much with its own hard-to-see immortality as with the clearly marked finiteness of its being.

Literature

1. Problema postchelovecheskogo budushchego [The Problem of the Posthuman Future]. Available at: http://www.transhumanism-russia.ru/content/view/555/94/ (accessed 15 February 2018) (in Russian).

2. Fedorova T. D. Man’s archetype as a category of anthropological metaphysics. Intellekt. Innovatsii. Investitsii [Intelligence. Innovation. Investments], 2014, no. 4, pp. 143‒152 (in Russian).

3. Gnatik E. N. The ideas of transhumanism in the era of convergent technologies. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Filosofi ya [Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Ser. Philosophy], 2013, no. 1, pp. 117‒127 (in Russian).

4. Deleuze G., Guattari F. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. USA, University of Minnesota Press, 1983. 400 p. (Russ. ed.: Deleuze G., Guattari F. Anti-Edip: kapitalizm i shizofreniya. Ekaterinburg, 2007. 672 p.).

5. Shlyakov A. V. The Nomadic Topology of Postmodernism. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya [Theory and Practice of Social Development], 2015, no. 18, pp. 251‒253 (in Russian).

6. Baudrillard J. The Transparency of Evil: Essays on extreme phenomena. London, New York, 1993. 174 p. (Russ. ed.: Baudrillard J. Prozrachnost' zla. Moscow, 2000. 258 p.).

7. Sakirko E. A. Idei postgumanizma i transgumanizma [The ideas of posthumanism and transhumanism]. Available at: http://sias.ru/publications/magazines/kultura/2012-2/teoriya-hudozhestve... (accessed 15 February 2018) (in Russian).

8. Alieva N. Z., Nekrasova E. G., Shevchenko Yu. S., Kovaldina O. G. Posthuman Future: Transhumanism and Immortalism. Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya [The Successes of Modern Natural Science], 2012, no. 6, pp. 202‒203 (in Russian).

9. Kurtsveil Rei. The Brain Can Be Cleared of Unnecessary Information to Study the New. Otkrytye sistemy. SUBD [Open systems. DBMS], 2012, no. 8, pp. 4‒13 (in Russian).

10. Markov B. V. Requiem to Sexual. In: Bodriyyar Zh. Zabyt Fuko [Forget Foucault]. St. Petersburg, 2000. 96 p. (in Russian).

11. Zagurskaya N. V. Posthuman: the Position of the Human Bbeing in Post-modern Situations. Chelovek postsovetskogo prostranstva: sb. materialov konf. [A person of the post-Soviet space. Materials of conf.]. St. Petersburg, 2005, iss. 3, pp. 245‒250 (in Russian).

12. Ferrando F. Posthumanism. Tidsskrift for kjønnsforskning. No. 2-2014, årg. 38, pp. 168‒172.

13. Braidotti R. Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory. New York, 1994. 328 p.

14. Barad K. Meeting the Universe Half-way: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press, 2007. 544 p.

15. Haraway D. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York, 1991. 287 p.

16. Shelley M. Frankenstein: or the Modern Prometheus. London, 1831. 202 p. (Russ. ed.: Shelley M. Frankenstein ili sovremenny Prometei. Moscow, 2014. 288 p.).

17. Shelley J. Stitch bitch: the patchwork girl. Available at: http://web.mit.edu/m-i-t/articles/index_jackson.html (accessed 20 February 2018).

18. Chelovekopodobnyy robot Sofi ya poluchila grazhdanstvo Saudovskoy Aravii (Android Sofia Obtained the Citizenship of Saudi Arabia). Available at: http://www.ntv.ru/novosti/1945500/ (accessed 20 February 2018) (in Russian).

19. V Amsterdame poyavitsya bordel s robotami-prostitutkami (In Amsterdam The Brothel will Appear with Robotsprostitutes). Available at: https://www.vesti.ru/doc.html?id=800441&cid=520 (accessed 20 February 2018) (in Russian).

20. Doklad OON: roboty zaymut dve treti rabochikh mest v razvivayushchikhsya stranakh (UN Report: Robots Will Occupy Two-Thirds of Jobs in Developing Countries). Available at: https://www.vesti.ru/doc.html?id=2822161 (accessed 20 February 2018) (in Russian).

Status: 
одобрено к публикации
Short Text (PDF): 
Full Text (PDF):