Cite this article as:

Kather R. . The Relation of Body and Mind – a Fundamental Issue concerning Human Identity. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2013, vol. 13, iss. 3, pp. 21-26. DOI:

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).

The Relation of Body and Mind – a Fundamental Issue concerning Human Identity

The actual debate on human identity is dominated by a one-sided definition of person: It focuses on rationality, language and consciousness of time, in brief on self-consciousness. The relevance of the body is constrained to its physiological functions. Yet as lived body it is also an expression of the inner life, of feelings, emotions and mental acts. As expression of the variety of intentional acts the relation of body and mind can be defined as a symbolic relation, as Ernst Cassirer, an important representative of neo-Kantianism, argues. By means of the bodily expression the inner life can be observed by fellow humans and the higher animals who can respond to its meaning by their own actions. Therefore the bodily expression of intentional acts is the necessary condition of intersubjectivity which embraces concrete actions, speech and emotions. The lived body is not the means of communication but its medium. Due to the bodily expression of intentional acts humans are not only essentially related to fellow humans, the relation to nature changes, too. As unity of body and mind persons are related essentially to fellow humans and to the whole range of nature. If human integrity has to be preserved, ethics must also deal with these relations.

  1. Merleau-Ponty M. Phänomenologie der Wahrnehmung. (Phenomenology of Perception). Berlin, 1966. 535 s.
  2. Sartre J.-P. Das Sein und das Nichts. Versuch einer phänomenologischen Ontologie. (Being and Nothing. An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology). Reinbek b. Hamburg, 1962. 785 s.
  3. Jaspers К. Philosophie II: Existenzerhellung. (Philosophy II: On Human Existence). Berlin; Heidelberg ; New York, 1973. 440 s.
  4. Bauer J. Das Gedächtnis des Körpers. Wie Beziehungen und Lebensstile unsere Gene steuern. Zürich, 2005. 272 s.
  5. Hick J. Religion. Die menschlichen Antworten auf die Frage nach Leben und Tod. (An interpretation of religion: humanity’s varied response to the transcendent.). München, 1996. 462 s.
  6. Ebner F. Das Wort und die geistigen Realitäten. (The Word of God and the Spiritual Reality). Frankfurt/M, 1980. 293 s.
  7. Leibniz G. W. Von den Ideen 27 § 9. Philosophische Schriften : in 3 Bd. (Philosophical Writings in 3 vol. Bd. 3.1/2). Darmstadt, 1985, pp. 407–409. 
  8. Locke J.: Über den menschlichen Verstand, (Essay on Human Understanding) : in 2 vol. Vol. 2. Über die Ideen. Hamburg, 1988. 484 s.
  9. Böhme G. Leibsein als Aufgabe. Leibphilosophie in pragmatischer Hinsicht (The Lived Body as challenge. Philosophy of the Lived Body in pragmatical Respect.) Zug, 2003. 402 s.
  10. Jonas H. Evolution und Freiheit (Evolution and Freedom). Jonas H. Philosophische Untersuchungen und metaphysische Vermutungen. (Philosophical Inquiries and Metaphysical Assumptions). Frankfurt/M ; Leipzig, 1992, pp. 11–33.
  11. Darwin C. Ursprung und Entwicklung der moralischen Gefühle (The Origin and the Evolution of Moral Feelings). Bayertz K. (Hg.) Evolution und Ethik (Evolution and Ethics). Stuttgart, 1993, pp. 37–48.
  12. Spaemann R. Personen. Versuche über den Unterschied zwischen ‘etwas’ und ‘jemand’ (On Persons. Essay on the Difference between ‚something‘ and ‚somebody‘). Stuttgart, 1998. 275 s.
одобрено к публикации
Short Text (PDF): 
Full Text (PDF): 

Generator XML for DOAJ