Cite this article as:

Ivanov A. V. Recent theories of secularization and perspectives of secular-religious dialogue. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2022, vol. 22, iss. 4, pp. 373-376. DOI:

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).

Recent theories of secularization and perspectives of secular-religious dialogue

Introduction. The article examines the current philosophical debates about the relationship between secular and religious worldviews. The article outlines recent forms of postsecularization as the continued existence of religious communities in a continually secularizing environment, identifying its main dimensions: the deinstitutionalization of the religious lifestyle, the individualization of faith, and the development of new social forms in the religious fi eld. Theoretical analysis. The central premise of the study is that existing approaches are not only controversial, but have their limitations to describing perspectives of secular-religious dialogue in a constructive way. On the basis of the discursive approach rational-discursive and relativistic-conventional strategies of secular-religious dialogue are identified and discussed. In this context, J. Habermas suggests that religion and secular worldviews have to learn from each other, and religion has to be “translated” into the rational language of secular culture, neutralizing its most dangerous components. At the same time, J.Milbank fi nds the essentialization of secular reason problematic. In conclusion, perspectives of secular-religious dialogue in the context of Russian culture are discussed. The essence of this model consists in the search for a compromise between the extremes of dogmatic faith and secular reason.

  1. Uzlaner D. Postsekulyarnyy povorot. Kak myslit o religii v XXI veke [The Post-Secular Turn. How to Think about Religion in the XXI Century]. Moscow, Publishing House of the Gaidar Institute, 2020. 416 p. (in Russian).
  2. Berger P. L. Introduction: Between Relativism and Fundamentalism. In: P. L. Berger, ed. Between Relativism and Fundamentalism: Religious resources for a middle position. Grand Rapids, MI; Cambridge, UK, William B. Eerdmans, 2010, pp. 1–13.
  3. Taylor Ch. Modes of Secularism. In: Bhargava R., ed. Secularism and its Critics. New Dehli, Oxford University Press, 1998, pp. 31–53.
  4. Habermas J., Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger. Dialektik der Säkularisierung: Über Vernunft und Religion. Freiburg im Breisgau, Verlag Herder, 2005. 64 S. (Russ. ed.: Khabermas Yu., Rattsinger (Benedikt XVI). Dialektika sekulyarizatsii. O razume i religii. Moscow, BibleyskoBogoslovskiy institut svyatogo apostola Andreya Publ., 2006. 112 p.
  5. Höhn H. Postsäkulare Gesellschaft? Aktualität und Relevanz einer Theorie religiöser Dispersion. In: Transformation religiöser Symbole und religiöser Kommunikation in der Diaspora. Sozialpsychologische und religionssoziologische Annäherungen an das Diskursfeld Islam in Deutschland. Wiesbaden, Springer, 2018, S. 65–80.
  6. Casanova J. Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1994. 330 p.
  7. Milbank J. Theology and Social Theory: Beyond Secular Reason. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2006. 443 p.
  8. Belzhelarskiy E. A. Sources and sense of the immanentistic discourse in the context of radical orthodoxy of John Milbank. Vestnik Russkoy khristianskoy gumanitarnoy akademii [Review of the Russian Christian Academy for the Humanities], 2017, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 194–203 (in Russian).
  9. Epshteyn M. N. Religiya posle ateizma. Novye vozmozhnosti teologii [Religion After Atheism. New Possibilities of Theology]. Moscow, AST-PRESS KNIGA Publ., 2013. 416 p. (in Russian).
одобрено к публикации

Generator XML for DOAJ