Cite this article as:

Богатова Л. М. «Man» and «Woman» on the Podium Postmodern. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2017, vol. 17, iss. 3, pp. 251-?. DOI:

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).

«Man» and «Woman» on the Podium Postmodern

Article is devoted social philosophically to the analysis of one of actual problems of modern gender researches – permutation of the gender text of culture in a postmodern situation. The author reveals the main signs of cardinal changes which undergo gender very types of classical culture. The special attention in article is paid to the analysis of a wide range sociocultural a determinant which cause deep metamorphoses of genders of masculine and feminny type. In article an attempt to develop the analysis of process of emancipation in ontologic measurement in which destructive nature of social liberation of femininity most boldly reveals is made. The author defends a position that in an ontologic context the emancipation has imitative character and generates only equality illusion. At invasion into an alien masculine bytiynost, appearance and internal keeping of «woman» are involuntarily deformed and undergo irreversible changes in which lines of a gender masculinization are seen. Fruitful the author’s reasonings on deep transformations which are undergone in space of modern culture by «man» who is fully involved in the occurring gender metamofoza are represented. The developed process of gender feminization of a maskulinnost leads to very original phenomenon which the author designates as «a maskulinnost atrophy». In article the attention to influence of equipment which is regarded as one of defining a determinant of process of a permutation of the gender text of culture of a postmodern is focused.


1. Engels F. The origin of the family, private property and the state. New York, 1933.158 p. (Russ. ed.: Engels F. Proiskhozhdenie semi, chastnoy sobstvennosti i gosudarstva. Marks K., Engels F. Soch.: v 30 t. Moscow, 1961, vol. 21, pp. 23–178).

2. Nietzsche F. Beyond Good and Evil. New York, 2002. 193 p. (Russ.ed.: Nitsshe F. Po tu storonu dobra i zla. Soch.: v 2 t. Moscow, 1990, vol. 2, pp. 238–406).

3. Bogatova L. M. Emansipatsiya: finita la femina? (Opyt sotsialno-filosofskogo issledovaniya) [Emancipation: finita la femina? {Experience of social and philosophical research}]. Kazan, 2009. 90 p. (in Russian).

4. Berdyaev N. A. Smysl tvorchestva [The meaning of the creative act]. Berdyaev N. A. Filosofija tvorchestva, kultury i iskusstva: v 2 t. [Philosophy of creativity, culture and art: in 2 vol.]. Moscow, 1994, vol. 1, pp. 37–341 (in Russian).

5. Freud Z. Three contributions to the sexual theory. New York, 1910. 92 p. (Russ. ed.: Freyd Z. Ob unizhenii lyubovnoy zhizni. Freud Z. Ocherki po psikhologii seksualnosti. Moscow, 1989. Available at: http://www., 6 (accessed 23 April 2017).

6. Fromm E. The art of loving. London, 1995. 104 p. (Russ. ed.: Fromm E. Iskusstvo lyubit. Moscow, 2016. 224 p.).

одобрено к публикации
Short Text (PDF): 
Full Text (PDF): 

Generator XML for DOAJ

Не определено в Выпуске поле Опубликована онлайн:publicationDate