Cite this article as:

Камышин А. С. Historical Transformation of Elite Power in the Problem Field of Social Philosophy . Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2016, vol. 16, iss. 2, pp. 148-?. DOI: 10.18500/1819-7671-2016-16-2-148-151

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).

Historical Transformation of Elite Power in the Problem Field of Social Philosophy

The article is devoted to the social and philosophical analysis of the historical changes of the elite power. There is made an attempt to identify the differences between elite power from the power of the elites. From this point of view, there are various approaches to study the ruling groups. And the hermeneutic approach is set off in the article. Based on it there is defined the elite of the text (the public), the elite of the subtext (behind the scenes), and the elite of the context (the real conditions of its existence). Here are also the features of the process of changing the types and structure of elite power in the contemporary ages. The author points the loss of “elitism” of the modern elite. It is noted that there are only the trappings of elitism, without its internal components in modern society. The article also highlights the fact that the fighting against the elitism brings more negative effects to the life in nowadays.


1. Ashin G. K. Ponyatie «elita» i ego rol v politicheskikh issledovaniyakh (The concept of «elite» and its role in political studies). Filosofi ya nauki (Philosophy of science), 2005, no. 7, pp. 23–45.

2. Gaman-Golutvina O. V. Politicheskie elity Russii. Vekhi istoricheskoy evolutsii (Russia’s political elite. Milestones in the history of evolution). Moscow, 2006. 446 p.

3.  Machiavelli N. Principe. Milan, 2011. 146 p. (Russ. ed.: Machiavelli N. Gosudar. Moscow, 1998. 656 p.).

4.  Nietzsche F. Jenseits von Gut und Bцse. Berlin, 1971. 296 p. (Russ. ed.: Nietzsche F. Po tu storonu dobra i zla. Moscow, 2001. 848 p.).

5.  Pareto V. Le traite de sociologie generale. Paris, 1933. 565 p. (Russ. ed.: Pareto V. Istoriya – kladbishche elit. Politicheskaya mysl. Perm, 2000, pp. 38–50).
6.  Gadamer H.-G. Das Erbe Europas (The European heritage). Frankfurt/M., 1995. 175 S.

7.  Sartori G. The Theory of democracy revised: in 2nd parts. Princeton, 1987. Part 1. 253 p. (Russ. ed.: Sartori G. Vertikalnaya demokratiya. Politicheskie issledovaniya, 1993, no. 2, pp. 80–89.).

8. Lomako O. Transformatsiya vlasti v bolshom gorode: genealogiya i analitika (Transformation of power in the big city: the genealogy and analytics). Vlast (Power), 2014, no. 3, pp. 48–51.

одобрено к публикации
Short Text (PDF): 
Full Text (PDF): 

Generator XML for DOAJ

Не определено в Выпуске поле Опубликована онлайн:publicationDate